RETRACTION: Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement on Transfusion and Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 40118529
- PMCID: PMC11928200
- DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70389
RETRACTION: Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement on Transfusion and Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Y. Chen, W. Yu, Y. Jiang, J. Gao, D. Xie, J. Yu, W. Li, Z. Liu, and J. Xiong, "Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement on Transfusion and Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients: A Meta-Analysis," International Wound Journal 21, no. 2 (2024): e14396, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14396. The above article, published online on 23 September 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not indicate their agreement with the retraction.
© 2025 The Author(s). International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Retraction of
-
Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Sep 23;21(2):e14396. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14396. Online ahead of print. Int Wound J. 2023. Retraction in: Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70389. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70389. PMID: 37740672 Free PMC article. Retracted.
References
-
- Int Wound J. 2023 Sep 23;: - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
