Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov-Dec;37(6):996-1008.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230489R2.

Peer-Coaching for Family Physicians to Close the Intention-to-Action Gap

Affiliations
Free article

Peer-Coaching for Family Physicians to Close the Intention-to-Action Gap

Tara Kiran et al. J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Nov-Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Peer coaching has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of clinical performance feedback reports to family physicians, but few peer-coaching quality improvement programs have been implemented and evaluated in primary care. Authors designed, implemented and evaluated a peer-coaching program for family physicians in a large, academic primary-care organization to explore its potential to enhance family physicians' use of clinical performance data for quality improvement.

Methods: Coaches were nominated by their peers and were trained to follow an evidence-informed facilitated feedback model for coaching. Data were collected through surveys, a focus-group with coaches, and individual interviews with coached family physicians ("coachees"). Data were analyzed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Authors trained 10 coaches who coached 25 family physicians over 3 months. Coachees who completed the survey (21/25) indicated a desire for additional coaching sessions in future; most (19/21) reported confidence in making practice change. Interview (n = 11) and focus-group participants (n = 8) findings validated acceptability of the coaching approach that emphasized empathy ahead of change-talk. Coaches helped coachees interpret care-quality measures, deal with negative emotional responses evoked, encouraged a sense of accountability for improvement, and sometimes offered new ways to manage common challenges. Coaching sessions led to a wide range of practice-improvement goals. However, effects on practice change were felt to be limited by the data available and the focus on individual physician factors when broader clinic issues acted as important barriers to improvement.

Conclusions: Peer coaching is a feasible approach to supporting family physicians' use of data for learning and practice improvement. More research is needed to understand the impact on practice outcomes and physician wellness.

Keywords: Coaching; Family Medicine; Family Physicians; Feedback; Primary Health Care; Qualitative Research; Quality Improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Drs. Kiran, Ramji, and Weyman were all in physician leadership roles with the St. Michael’s Hospital Academic Family Health Team during the study period. Dr. Ramji has been a Quality Improvement Coach with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario since December 2021. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

LinkOut - more resources