Real-world experience with continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion: insights and recommendations
- PMID: 40121314
- DOI: 10.1007/s00702-025-02911-5
Real-world experience with continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion: insights and recommendations
Abstract
Traditional advanced therapies in Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias like continuous apomorphine infusion (CSAI), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), levodopa-carbidopa entacapone intestinal gel (LECIG), or deep brain stimulation (DBS) have played a central role in managing therapy-related complications. Recently, continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion (CSFLI) has emerged as a novel therapeutic option. This manuscript provides insights from one year of real-world experience with CSFLI, addressing critical questions that clinicians face when selecting the most appropriate therapy for advanced PD. Our discussion centers on key considerations for patient selection, exploring which individuals may benefit more from CSFLI compared to other device-aided therapies. We highlight CSFLI's advantages in flexibility and ease of use but also consider limitations, particularly its side effects, such as skin-related issues. Recommendations are presented on how to prevent and manage these adverse effects to maximize patient compliance and therapeutic success. Additionally, the paper examines strategies for optimizing concurrent oral medications when combined with CSFLI, providing guidance on balancing pump infusion with necessary adjunctive oral treatments.
Keywords: Advanced Treatment; Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa; Motor Fluctuations; Parkinson’s disease.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: T.K. serves as the vice president of the German DBS Society. E.B. has no interests to declare. J.K is Specialty Chief Editor for Frontiers in Neurology (section Applied Neuroimaging) and Associate Editor (Neurology) for Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease.
References
-
- Abboud H, Floden D, Thompson NR et al (2015) Impact of mild cognitive impairment on outcome following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord 21:249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.12.018 - DOI
-
- Acland KM, Churchyard A, Fletcher CL et al (1998) Panniculitis in association with apomorphine infusion. Br J Dermatol 138:480–482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02128.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aldred J, Freire-Alvarez E, Amelin AV et al (2023) Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa in Parkinson’s disease: safety and efficacy results from a 12-month, single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. Neurol Ther 12:1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00533-1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Alegret M, Valldeoriola F, Martí M et al (2004) Comparative cognitive effects of bilateral subthalamic stimulation and subcutaneous continuous infusion of apomorphine in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 19:1463–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20237 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Antonini A, Isaias IU, Rodolfi G et al (2011) A 5-year prospective assessment of advanced Parkinson disease patients treated with subcutaneous apomorphine infusion or deep brain stimulation. J Neurol 258:579–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5793-z - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
