Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):e528-e535.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.27065.

Finite element analysis of shape and thickness variations in patient-specific implants for t-shaped genioplasty

Affiliations

Finite element analysis of shape and thickness variations in patient-specific implants for t-shaped genioplasty

E-F Akkoyun et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: T-shaped genioplasty is a versatile surgical technique used to correct chin deformities by altering its vertical, transverse, and sagittal dimensions. Despite numerous advancements in patient-specific implants (PSIs), the biomechanical impact of PSI thickness and the number of screws used for fixation remain unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effects of PSI thickness and screw configurations on fixation stability in T-shaped genioplasty using finite element analysis.

Material and methods: Mandibular computed tomography data were used to construct 12 three-dimensional models with varying PSI thicknesses (0.6 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.2 mm) and screw configurations (five, six, seven, and eight screws). T-shaped osteotomies were applied to create narrowing and widening genioplasty models, with iliac bone grafts placed in widening scenarios. Horizontal forces of 50 N were applied bilaterally, and fixation stability was evaluated using von Mises stress and bone displacement. Fixation was considered stable when bone displacement amounts were below 1 mm.

Results: In narrowing models, fixation stability was achieved with five screws and a 1.2 mm PSI or seven screws with a 0.9 mm or 1.2 mm PSI, showing stress values within titanium's yield strength limits. For widening models, stable fixation was achieved with six screws and a 0.9 mm or 1.2 mm PSI, or eight screws across all tested thicknesses. Bone displacement was minimal with thicker PSIs and higher screw counts, demonstrating improved stability.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of PSI customization in optimizing fixation stability in T-shaped genioplasty. A minimum of five screws with a 1.2 mm plate or seven screws with a 0.9 mm plate is suggested for narrowing, while six screws with a 0.9 mm plate or eight screws with any tested thickness are sufficient for widening. Future research should address combined movements, dynamic loading, and long-term outcomes to refine PSI fixation strategies further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Widening (a) and narrowing (b) genioplasty models.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plates with six screw holes (a) and eight screw holes (b) designed for widening genioplasty models.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plates with five screw holes (a) and seven screw holes (b) designed for narrowing genioplasty models.

References

    1. Ferretti C, Reyneke JP. Genioplasty. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24:79–85. - PubMed
    1. Precious DS, Cardoso AB, Cardoso MC, Doucet JC. Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;18:439–44. - PubMed
    1. Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957;10:899–909. - PubMed
    1. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Horizontal Osteotomy of the Mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964;34:464–71. - PubMed
    1. Grime PD, Blenkinsopp PT. Horizontal-T genioplasty--(a modified technique for the broad or asymmetrical chin) Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28:215–21. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources