Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr:124:106491.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106491. Epub 2025 Mar 12.

In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a strutted intradiscal spacer for lumbar discectomy

Affiliations

In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a strutted intradiscal spacer for lumbar discectomy

Werner Schmoelz et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Discectomy plus implantation of a strutted intradiscal spacer has been shown to reduce reoperations and reherniations versus discectomy alone following lumbar disc herniation. This study explored the underlying biomechanics of the intradiscal spacer.

Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric lumbar spine specimens (L2 to L5) from three donors were used. Following box annulotomy to simulate disc herniation, a discectomy was performed. One segment from each donor was randomly assigned to either an untreated control group or the test group where an intradiscal spacer was implanted. A six degree of freedom universal spine tester assessed range of motion (RoM) in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation in the native state in load controlled [±7.5 Nm] and intervals up to 60,000 cycles. Disc height was measured on fluoroscopy for multiple timepoints. The segments were also analyzed to detect possible reherniation during the cycling loading.

Findings: Following 60,000 cycles, the mean percentage RoM increase versus the intact state was less for discectomy plus the intradiscal spacer versus discectomy alone for lateral bending (170.7 ± 10.0 vs. 222.5 ± 33.3 %), flexion/extension (178.5 ± 6.1 vs. 204.6 ± 44.3 %) and axial rotation (284.4 ± 127.2 vs. 362.3 % ± 240.4 %). Mean overall disc height loss versus the annulotomy state was also less with the intradiscal spacer versus discectomy alone (-19.3 ± 3.7 vs. -29.1 ± 6.1 %). There was no evidence of device subsidence or migration.

Interpretation: This study helps to explain the clinical observation that insertion of a strutted intradiscal spacer following discectomy reduces reherniation rate by mechanically limiting the increase in RoM and disc height loss following lumbar discectomy.

Keywords: Cadaver study; Disc repair; Intradiscal spacer; Lumbar disc herniation; Reherniation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Robin Srour reports writing assistance was provided by SC MEDICA. Werner Schmoelz reports financial support was provided by SC MEDICA. Robin Srour has patent #WO/2017/025694 issued to SC MEDICA. Robin Srour (corresponding author) reports having a relative that is employed by SC Medica. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.