Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May;30(5):417-423.
doi: 10.1111/resp.70030. Epub 2025 Mar 23.

Lung Function Course of Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis After Initiation of Anti-Fibrotic Treatment: Real-World Data From the Dutch National Registry

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Lung Function Course of Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis After Initiation of Anti-Fibrotic Treatment: Real-World Data From the Dutch National Registry

Mark G J P Platenburg et al. Respirology. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background and objective: Real-world data on lung function course of patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) treated with anti-fibrotic medication are limited. We evaluated forced vital capacity (FVC) decline in patients with PPF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who started anti-fibrotic treatment.

Methods: This was a nationwide multi-centre registry study in 16 hospitals throughout the Netherlands. Patients treated with anti-fibrotic medication, with at least two in-hospital pulmonary function tests before and after the initiation of anti-fibrotic treatment, were included. Linear mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse lung function trajectories 1 year before and after the start of anti-fibrotic treatment.

Results: Data from 538 patients (n = 142 with PPF, n = 396 with IPF) were analysed. In PPF, the mean annualised FVC decline was 412 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 308-517 mL) before the initiation of anti-fibrotic treatment, and 18 mL (95% CI: 9-124 mL) in the first year after. The corresponding declines for IPF were 158 mL (95% CI: 78-239 mL) and 38 mL (95% CI: 24-101 mL). In both groups, treatment significantly slowed down FVC decline, although the change was larger in the PPF group (p = 0.0006). In the first year after treatment initiation, 23.9% of patients with PPF and 28.0% with IPF had disease progression.

Conclusion: The FVC decline significantly slowed after the initiation of treatment for both IPF and PPF. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients exhibited disease progression, despite the start of anti-fibrotic treatment. Early identification of these patients is crucial for treatment adaptations and inclusion in clinical trials.

Keywords: anti‐fibrotic medication; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; lung function; progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This registry was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Estimated average lung function trajectories, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, in idiopathic and progressive pulmonary fibrosis before and after anti‐fibrotic treatment initiation. DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; PPF, progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Linear mixed‐effects model analysis of in‐hospital forced vital capacity (FVC) in both litres and percent predicted, and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon (DLCO) in percentage predicted from 1 year before and after treatment initiation. Black represents the patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and red demonstrates the patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Annual changes in FVC, FVC percentage predicted, and DLCO percentage predicted are displayed before and during anti‐fibrotic treatment in the left, middle, and right panels, respectively. The dotted lines represent the anticipated disease course, without initiation of anti‐fibrotic treatment.

References

    1. Podolanczuk A. J., Thomson C. C., Remy‐Jardin M., et al., “Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: State of the Art for 2023,” European Respiratory Journal 61 (2023): 2200957. - PubMed
    1. Lederer D. J. and Martinez F. J., “Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 1811–1823. - PubMed
    1. Raghu G., Remy‐Jardin M., Richeldi L., et al., “Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (An Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 205 (2022): e18–e47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solomon J. J., Danoff S. K., Woodhead F. A., et al., “Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis‐Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Randomised, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase 2 Study,” Lancet Respiratory Medicine 11 (2023): 87–96. - PubMed
    1. Behr J., Prasse A., Kreuter M., et al., “Pirfenidone in Patients With Progressive Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases Other Than Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (RELIEF): A Double‐Blind, Randomised, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase 2b Trial,” Lancet Respiratory Medicine 9 (2021): 476–486. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding