Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun;51(6):687-706.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.03.004. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

CBCT-Assessed Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Primary Endodontic Treatment and Retreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

CBCT-Assessed Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Primary Endodontic Treatment and Retreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Joāo Filipe Brochado Martins et al. J Endod. 2025 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Periapical radiographs have limitations in assessing endodontic treatment outcomes, which can be addressed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This systematic review evaluates primary root canal treatment and retreatment outcomes using CBCT, focusing on periapical healing, success, and prognostic factors.

Methods: A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed up to March 8, 2024, in collaboration with a medical information specialist. Three reviewers (J.F.B.M., A.C.G, P.D.N.) independently performed article selection and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed, and evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis and meta-regression established pooled periapical healing and outcome rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and identify outcome predictors (P < .05).

Results: Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled periapical healing rate using "loose criteria" was 87% (95% CI: 81%-91%) for teeth and 84% (95% CI: 78%-88%) for roots; using "strict criteria" was 36% (95% CI: 22%-53%) for teeth, and 44% (95% CI: 16%-76%) for roots. The weighted pooled success rates for teeth were 85% (95% CI: 80%-89%) under "loose criteria" and 45% (95% CI: 31%-59%) under "strict" criteria. Meta-regression identified outcome predictors include number of visits, irrigant type, tooth type, operator experience, apical preparation size and taper, and obturation technique.

Conclusions: CBCT reveals lower success rates under strict criteria compared to loose criteria (36% vs 88%). While CBCT offers greater diagnostic accuracy, its routine use for outcome evaluation may not be necessary, as it yields results similar to periapical radiograph under loose criteria.

Keywords: Apical periodontitis; CBCT; endodontics; outcomes; prognostic factors; retreatment; root canal treatment; secondary root canal treatment; success.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources