Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Mar 23;16(1):2848.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57884-6.

Ulinastatin in the treatment of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Ulinastatin in the treatment of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Xuguang Wang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis (RTOM) is a common side effect of radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). In this phase 3 trial, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ulinastatin (UTI) for the prevention and treatment of RTOM in LA-NPC patients (NCT03387774). The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥3 acute RTOM during radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include cumulative incidence of RTOM, recovery rate, the onset time and duration of grade ≥3 RTOM, oral pain (severe), safety and survival outcomes. 179 eligible patients are randomly assigned to UTI Group (n = 89) or Control group (n = 90). All UTI group patients complete UTI treatment as planned, and both groups complete scheduled CCRT. The incidence of grade 3 RTOM is significantly lower in UTI group compared with control group (25.8% vs 41.1%, P = 0.030). The trial meet its prespecified primary endpoint. No Ulinastatin related adverse events are observed during treatment. The 3-year overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in UTI group and control group are similar between two groups. In this work, Ulinastatin can effectively reduce the severity of RTOM and oral pain without increasing toxicity and compromising survivals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (B2017-063-01-01) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03387774.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Trial profile.
UTI Ulinastatin, CCRT concurrent chemoradiotherapy, AEs adverse events.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Acute oral mucosities by treatment groups.
A Incidence of acute oral mucosities for 179 evaluable patients. The difference in incidence of grade 3 RTOM during CCRT between groups was statistically significant (P = 0.030, two-sided Fisher’s exact test). Statistical note: no adjustments for multiple comparisons were applied, as the analysis focused on pre-specified differences in grade 3 RTOM. B Cumulative rate of grade ≥3 mucositis during treatment in UTI group (89 patients, at 7 weeks 23 at risk), Control Group (90 patients, at 7 weeks 37 at risk). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. *: Significant difference between groups (two-sided Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05). UTI Ulinastatin.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Oral pain by treatment groups.
A Incidence of oral pain for 179 evaluable patients. The difference in the incidence of severe oral pain during CCRT between groups was statistically significant (P = 0.038, two-sided Fisher’s exact test). Statistical note: no adjustments for multiple comparisons were applied, as the analysis focused on pre-specified differences in severe oral pain. B Cumulative rate of severe oral pain during treatment in UTI group (89 patients, at 7 weeks 20 at risk), Control group (90 patients, at 7 weeks 33 at risk). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. *: Significant difference between groups (two-sided Fisher’s exact test; P < 0.05). UTI Ulinastatin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen, Y.-P. et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet394, 64–80 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Al-Sarraf, M. et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase ||| randomized Intergroup study 0099. J. Clin. Oncol.16, 1310–1317 (1998). - PubMed
    1. Chen, L. et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol.13, 163–171 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Sun, Y. et al. Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol.17, 1509–1520 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Zhang, Y. et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med.381, 1124–1135 (2019). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources