Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT
- PMID: 40123004
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9
Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT
Abstract
Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: CS has received travel expenses or honoraria for participation in advisory boards, symposia or other scientific events by Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceutical, Neovii, Janssen, and Kite. FS institutional consulting fees from BMS/Celgene, Incyte, Kite/Gilead; speaker fees from Kite/Gilead, Incyte; travel support from Kite/Gilead, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Neovii, Janssen; research funding from Kite/Gilead, Novartis, BMS/Celgene. SP has received travel expenses or honoraria for participation in advisory boards, symposia, or other scientific events by Alexion, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceutical, Therakos, OneLamda, Sobi as well as research funding by JANSSEN HORIZON program. JK has received grants from Novartis, Miltenyi Biotech, and Gadeta. JK was a Gadeta shareholder; patent licenses to Gadeta and Miltenyi Biotech. None of these disclosures construe a potential competitive interest with the research discussed in this article. All other co-authors declare no COI. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The scientific board of the CTIWP of EBMT approved this study. All patients gave written informed consent for the use of their data. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
References
-
- Falkenburg JHF, Schmid C, Kolb HJ, Locatelli F, Kuball J, Carreras E et al. Delayed transfer of immune cells or the art of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) 2.0. In: Sureda A, Corbacioglu, S, Greco R, Kröger N, Carreras E. (eds) The EBMT handbook 2024; pp 531–9.
-
- Pagliuca S, Schmid C, Santoro N, Simonetta F, Battipaglia G, Guillaume T, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: basic considerations and best practice recommendations from the EBMT. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11:e448–58. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources