Diagnostic Innovations: Advances in imaging techniques for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma
- PMID: 40124904
- PMCID: PMC11930372
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100669
Diagnostic Innovations: Advances in imaging techniques for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma
Abstract
Introduction: The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) defines myeloma related bone disease (MBD) as a diagnostic criterion for symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) as the presence of osteolytic lesions ≥ 5 mm or more than one focal lesion (FL) ≥ 5 mm by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is recommended as the first-choice imaging technique for the diagnosis of MBD with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) being considered a possible alternative at staging, whereas use of MRI studies is recommended in cases without myeloma-defining events (MDEs) in order to exclude the presence of FLs. Furthermore, use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT is recommended in response assessment, to be integrated with hematologic response and bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD).
Areas covered: In this paper, we review novel functional imaging techniques in MM, particularly focusing on their advantages, limits, applications and comparisons with 18F-FDG-PET/CT or other standardized imaging techniques.
Conclusions: Combining both morphological and functional imaging, 18F-FDG-PET/CT is currently considered a standard imaging technique in MM for staging (despite false positive or negative results) and response assessment. The introduction of novel functional imaging techniques, as whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI-MRI), or novel PET tracers might be useful in overcoming these limits. Future studies will give more information on the complementarity of these imaging techniques or whether one of them might become a new gold standard in MM.
Keywords: 18F-FDG-PET/CT; Bone disease; DCE-MRI; Imaging; Multiple Myeloma; WB-DWI-MRI.
© 2025 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. IR has received honoraria from Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi and advisory role for GlaxoSmithKline; KM has received honoraria from Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi and Janssen; LP has received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Pfizer; PT has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer; CN has received consultant honoraria from Keosys and funding from Radius, Immedica, Thema Sinergie; MC has served as Consulting/advisory role for and has received honoraria from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Menarini Stemline, Sanofi, and Karyopharm Therapeutics; EZ has received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Takeda. MT, SB, AC, IS, EM, RR, SM, FB, MP, and MI declare no potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.Ann Hematol. 2020 Dec;99(12):2869-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04265-2. Epub 2020 Sep 19. Ann Hematol. 2020. PMID: 32951093
-
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT.Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30843003
-
Hybrid simultaneous whole-body 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI imaging in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: first diagnostic performance and clinical added value results.Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6438-6447. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09593-1. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37022439
-
Multiple Myeloma Guidelines and Their Recent Updates: Implications for Imaging.Rofo. 2019 Nov;191(11):998-1009. doi: 10.1055/a-0897-3966. Epub 2019 May 28. Rofo. 2019. PMID: 31137045 Review. English, German.
-
18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3641-3649. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06703-1. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32125513
References
-
- Kyle R.A., Gertz M.A., Witzig T.E., et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2003;78(1):21–33. - PubMed
-
- Terpos E., Berenson J., Raje N., Roodman G.D. Management of bone disease in multiple myeloma. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2014;7(1):113–125. - PubMed
-
- Terpos E., Berenson J., Cook R.J., et al. Prognostic variables for survival and skeletal complications in patients with multiple myeloma osteolytic bone disease. Leukemia. 2010;24(5):1043–1049. - PubMed
-
- Rosiñol L., Beksac M., Zamagni E., et al. Expert review on soft-tissue plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: definition, disease assessment and treatment considerations. Br. J. Haematol. 2021;194(3):496–507. - PubMed
-
- International Myeloma Working Group Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br. J. Haematol. 2003;121(5):749–757. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources