Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 10;9(11):2763-2772.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014846.

Real-world outcomes for young adult patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cell therapy

Affiliations

Real-world outcomes for young adult patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cell therapy

Hannah Lust et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) are approved CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) products for young adults (YA) with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A distinct analysis of YAs receiving commercial CD19 CAR T has not been reported. Using retrospective data from the Pediatric Real-World CAR T Consortium and the Real-World Outcomes of CAR T in Adult ALL collaboration, we describe the efficacy and safety of tisa-cel and brexu-cel in 70 YAs (18-26 years; tisa-cel, n = 50; brexu-cel, n = 20). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were observed more frequently for brexu-cel vs tisa-cel (CRS, 85% vs 56%; ICANS, 40% vs 18%). Complete response rates were similar between products at 80% for brexu-cel and 88% for tisa-cel. Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 12 months was 46% for brexu-cel and 36% for tisa-cel. Durability of remission over 12 months was 61% for brexu-cel vs 41% for tisa-cel; 12-month overall survival (OS) for brexu-cel was 84% vs 68% for tisa-cel. In multivariate analysis, low disease burden was associated with improved OS, whereas inotuzumab before CAR T was associated with inferior outcomes. This study demonstrates comparable real-world efficacy among YAs receiving CD19 CAR T irrespective of CAR T construct; however, rates of toxicity seem higher with brexu-cel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: L.M.S. has served on advisory committees for Novartis and Cargo Therapeutics. I.A. has served as a consultant for Kite, Sobi, Jazz, Pfizer, Amgen, and Takeda; received honoraria from Takeda; served on advisory committees for Amgen, Pfizer, Jazz, Kite, Takeda, Syndax, Sobi, and Wugen; and received research support from AbbVie and MacroGenics. J.R. has served as a consultant for Novartis. K.J.C. has served as a consultant for Novartis; served as a board member for Turn Bio and PromiCell; and received research funding from Novartis, Cellectis, and Atara Biotherapeutics. C.L.P. has served on an advisory committee for Novartis. S.H.C.B.’s spouse is employed by Takeda. S.C. has served as a consultant for Pfizer and Jazz. M.H. has served on advisory committees for Sobi and Novartis. P.S. has served on an advisory committee for Sobi. M.Q. has served as a consultant for Novartis and Mesoblast. R.D.C. has served on advisory committees for Autolus and PeproMene Bio; served as a consultant and received honoraria for Autolus, Amgen, Jazz, Kite, and Pfizer; and received research funding from Amgen, Kite, Incyte, Merck, Pfizer, Servier, and Vanda, and R.D.C.’s spouse was employed by and owned stock in Seagen. V.K.K. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, and Kite, and received research funding from Incyte. P.S. received honoraria from Autolus and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), and served on a speaker’s bureau for Sanofi. M.S. served as a consultant for Jazz and Novartis. A.L. served as a consultant for Pfizer and CTI BioPharma. G.Y. served on a speaker’s bureau for Jazz, Kite, BMS, Incyte, Sobi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Servier. V.B. served on advisory committees for AstraZeneca, Allogene, BeiGene, and CRISPR, and received research funding from Citius and Incyte. E.C. served as a consultant for AbbVie. A.S.A. served on advisory committees for Jazz, Taiho, and Novartis; received honoraria from Kite, Pfizer, Jazz, Beam, Nkarta, Novartis, Kura, and Amgen; and received research funding from Servier, ImmunoGen, GlycoMimetics, Pfizer, Incyte, Seattle Genetics, and MacroGenics. B.S. received research funding from Incyte, Jazz, Kite, and Servier; received honoraria from Janssen, Spectrum/Acrotech, BeiGene, and Gilead Sciences; served as a consultant for PeproMene, Lilly, Autolus, Deciphera, Century Therapeutics, Jazz, Kite, Precision Biosciences, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Adaptive Biotechnologies, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; and served on an advisory committee for PeproMene Bio. L.M. served as a consultant for Amgen, Pfizer, Kite, Autolus, and Astellas; received honoraria from Kite; received research funding from BMS, Adaptive, Kite, Astellas, Orca Bio, and Jasper; and served on an advisory committee for Adaptive. R.F. received research funding from Kite and Novartis; and served on an advisory committee for Kite. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
RFS at 12 months among YA patients receiving tisa-cel compared with those receiving brexu-cel. RFS was 36% for YA patients receiving tisa-cel (95% CI, 26-52) and 46% for those receiving brexu-cel 46% (95% CI, 31-81); HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.50-2.54; P = .79. RFS was censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant in remission and last follow-up.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
OS at 12 months among YA patients receiving tisa-cel compared with those receiving brexu-cel. OS was 68% for YA patients receiving tisa-cel (95% CI, 56-85) and 84% for those receiving brexu-cel (95% CI, 81-100); HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.62-5.19; P = .35. OS was censored for the last follow-up.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
DOR at 12 months among YA patients achieving remission who received tisa-cel compared with those who received brexu-cel. DOR was 41% for YA patients receiving tisa-cel (95% CI, 27-61) and 61% for those receiving brexu-cel (95% CI, 41-93); HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.01-6.42; P = .12. DOR was censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant in remission and last follow-up. Time 0 was defined as day 28 after CAR T infusion, which was the first time point of established remission.

References

    1. Freyer DR, Devidas M, La M, et al. Postrelapse survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is independent of initial treatment intensity: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2011;117(11):3010–3015. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masurekar AN, Parker CA, Shanyinde M, et al. Outcome of central nervous system relapses in childhood acute lymphoblastic Leukaemia - prospective open cohort analyses of the ALLR3 trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(10) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen K, Devidas M, Cheng SC, et al. Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 2008;22(12):2142–2150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muffly L, Alvarez E, Lichtensztajn D, Abrahão R, Gomez SL, Keegan T. Patterns of care and outcomes in adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a population-based study. Blood Adv. 2018;2(8):895–903. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, et al. A pediatric regimen for older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of CALGB 10403 [published correction appears in Blood. 2019;134(13):1111] Blood. 2019;133(14):1548–1559. - PMC - PubMed