Reformulating patient stratification for targeting interventions by accounting for severity of downstream outcomes resulting from disease onset: a case study in sepsis
- PMID: 40127468
- PMCID: PMC12012354
- DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf036
Reformulating patient stratification for targeting interventions by accounting for severity of downstream outcomes resulting from disease onset: a case study in sepsis
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify differences between (1) stratifying patients by predicted disease onset risk alone and (2) stratifying by predicted disease onset risk and severity of downstream outcomes. We perform a case study of predicting sepsis.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using observational data from Michigan Medicine at the University of Michigan (U-M) between 2016 and 2020 and the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) between 2008 and 2012. We measured the correlation between the estimated sepsis risk and the estimated effect of sepsis on mortality using Spearman's correlation. We compared patients stratified by sepsis risk with patients stratified by sepsis risk and effect of sepsis on mortality.
Results: The U-M and BIDMC cohorts included 7282 and 5942 ICU visits; 7.9% and 8.1% developed sepsis, respectively. Among visits with sepsis, 21.9% and 26.3% experienced mortality at U-M and BIDMC. The effect of sepsis on mortality was weakly correlated with sepsis risk (U-M: 0.35 [95% CI: 0.33-0.37], BIDMC: 0.31 [95% CI: 0.28-0.34]). High-risk patients identified by both stratification approaches overlapped by 66.8% and 52.8% at U-M and BIDMC, respectively. Accounting for risk of mortality identified an older population (U-M: age = 66.0 [interquartile range-IQR: 55.0-74.0] vs age = 63.0 [IQR: 51.0-72.0], BIDMC: age = 74.0 [IQR: 61.0-83.0] vs age = 68.0 [IQR: 59.0-78.0]).
Discussion: Predictive models that guide selective interventions ignore the effect of disease on downstream outcomes. Reformulating patient stratification to account for the estimated effect of disease on downstream outcomes identifies a different population compared to stratification on disease risk alone.
Conclusion: Models that predict the risk of disease and ignore the effects of disease on downstream outcomes could be suboptimal for stratification.
Keywords: causal effect estimation; downstream outcomes; heterogeneous effects; patient stratification.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Wiens J, Guttag JV, Horvitz E. Patient risk stratification for hospital-associated C. diff as a time-series classification task. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;25:467-475.
-
- Wiens J, Guttag J, Horvitz E. Patient risk stratification with time-varying parameters: a multitask learning approach. J Mach Learn Res. 2016;17:1-23.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical