Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens
- PMID: 4012946
- DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90280-8
Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens
Abstract
Prostate biopsy and total prostatectomy specimens from 31 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were compared using the Gleason histopathologic grading system. The overall accuracy when grouping the scores into three categories (2-4, 5-7, and 8-10) was 81 per cent. The incidence of critical undergrading was 6 per cent while the incidence of critical overgrading was 13 per cent. Eighty-seven per cent of the biopsy scores were plus or minus 1 Gleason unit of the prostatectomy scores. Intraobserver variation was less than 1 Gleason unit. The mean absolute difference between the biopsy and the total prostatectomy specimen was 0.77 Gleason units. The Gleason category score of the total prostate specimen can be predicted from the biopsy tissue with reasonably good accuracy. The limitation of this grading system in predicting the presence or absence of pelvic node involvement is discussed.
Similar articles
-
Gleason histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma. Correlations between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens.Cancer. 1986 Jan 15;57(2):346-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<346::aid-cncr2820570226>3.0.co;2-e. Cancer. 1986. PMID: 3942967
-
Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.Eur Urol. 1998;33(3):261-70. doi: 10.1159/000019578. Eur Urol. 1998. PMID: 9555550
-
Does extended prostate needle biopsy improve the concordance of Gleason scores between biopsy and prostatectomy in the Taiwanese population?J Chin Med Assoc. 2012 Mar;75(3):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 9. J Chin Med Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22440266
-
Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma in needle biopsies vs. radical prostatectomy specimens.Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2005 Jun;27(3):125-33. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2005. PMID: 16121633 Review.
-
Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.Eur Urol. 2000 Jun;37(6):670-4. doi: 10.1159/000020216. Eur Urol. 2000. PMID: 10828666 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promises.Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2021 May;109(5):820-838. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2021.3054390. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2021. PMID: 37786449 Free PMC article.
-
Radiomic features on MRI enable risk categorization of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: Preliminary findings.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb 22:10.1002/jmri.25983. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25983. Online ahead of print. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29469937 Free PMC article.
-
Histopathological pattern in prostatic adenocarcinomas: is it a prognostic criterion?Int Urol Nephrol. 1991;23(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02549729. Int Urol Nephrol. 1991. PMID: 1657811
-
Histopathology-based prognostic score is independent prognostic factor of gastric carcinoma.BMC Cancer. 2014 Sep 11;14:663. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-663. BMC Cancer. 2014. PMID: 25212951 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical