Tibial implant varus >3° does not adversely affect outcomes or revision rates in functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty in a minimum of 2-year follow-up
- PMID: 40130488
- DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12659
Tibial implant varus >3° does not adversely affect outcomes or revision rates in functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty in a minimum of 2-year follow-up
Abstract
Purpose: Functional alignment (FA) aims to restore knee kinematics by balancing laxities and adapting implant positioning. This study evaluates safety and outcomes of >3° varus tibial positioning in patients with varus deformity undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: This retrospective study included 337 patients with varus deformity undergoing robotic-assisted TKA with FA principles with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on tibial varus positioning: ≤3° varus: Group A and >3° varus: Group B. Preoperative and postoperative coronal alignment, implant positioning, and outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at final follow-up. The primary outcome was implants' survivorship, and secondary outcomes included complication rates and functional scores. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests for group comparisons, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for implant survivorship, and multivariate regression for key covariates.
Results: Implant survivorship was 99.4% in Group B over a median follow-up of 30 months, with one revision due to aseptic loosening and 100% in Group A (p = 0.36). The overall complication rates were 12.7% in Group A and 10.2% in B (p = 0.48). The median KSS-knee and function scores were 94.5 and 90 in Group A and 94 and 90 in B (p = 0.88 and 0.8, respectively). The final FJS was 82 in Group A and 84 in B (p = 0.8). No significant differences were observed in postoperative knee range of motion between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis showed that none of the included covariates were statistically significant predictors of implant failure.
Conclusion: FA in robotic-assisted TKA with tibial positioning >3° varus seems to be safe and reliable in patients with varus deformity, demonstrating similar revision rates, implant survivorship, and outcomes compared to the ≤3° tibial varus group.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: functional alignment; personalised alignment; robotic knee; total knee; total knee replacement.
© 2025 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 1: Variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Aug;33(8):2928-2938. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12658. Epub 2025 Mar 25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. PMID: 40130477 Free PMC article.
-
No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):140-149. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003193. Epub 2024 Aug 14. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39145997 Clinical Trial.
-
A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90° of flexion impacts clinical outcomes.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2581-2591. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12648. Epub 2025 Mar 18. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. PMID: 40099499 Free PMC article.
-
Kinematic Alignment Does Not Result in Clinically Important Improvements After TKA Compared With Mechanical Alignment: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1020-1030. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003356. Epub 2025 Jan 21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39842026
-
What is the "safe zone" for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06811-5. Epub 2022 Jan 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 34973095 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the use of image-based robotic technology and functional alignment.SICOT J. 2025;11:30. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025025. Epub 2025 May 19. SICOT J. 2025. PMID: 40391825 Free PMC article.
-
Cementless versus cemented fixation in image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty guided by functional knee positioning principles.SICOT J. 2025;11:32. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025027. Epub 2025 May 27. SICOT J. 2025. PMID: 40421867 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow‐up at 20 years. J Bone Jt Surg. 2018;100(6):472–478.
-
- Beckers G, Meneghini RM, Hirschmann MT, Kostretzis L, Kiss M‐O, Vendittoli P‐A. Ten flaws of systematic mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(3):591–599.
-
- Begum FA, Kayani B, Magan AA, Chang JS, Haddad FS. Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty: mechanical, kinematic, anatomical, and functional alignment. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2(6):397–404.
-
- Brown ML, Javidan P, Early S, Bugbee W. Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10‐year institutional report. Arthroplasty. 2022;4(1):39.
-
- Chang JS, Kayani B, Wallace C, Haddad FS. Functional alignment achieves soft‐tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor‐guided technology. Bone Jt J. 2021;103–B(3):507–514.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials