Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;54(7):1199-1212.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02142-8. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

Beyond retreat: Land-seascape legacies of change and continuation

Affiliations

Beyond retreat: Land-seascape legacies of change and continuation

Christina Hanna et al. Ambio. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Planned retreat is an increasingly common climate adaptation approach. Whilst effective at reducing exposure to unacceptable risks, it is subject to significant resistance. In response, research has focussed on risk, governance and justice, but there has been less attention on spatial perspectives, including how spaces are reconfigured and the resultant land-seascape legacies. We identify 161 cases of planned retreat and develop a typology to analyse land use change in origin sites worldwide. In many cases, we find land transfer from private to public ownership, and restoration of land and environmental relations, to a complete failure to consider spatial legacies. The research stresses the importance of moving beyond planned retreat as risk management to consider longer-term spatial relations. Consequently, we argue, the definition and practice of 'planned retreat' must include early planning for the values, uses and reconfigurations of origin sites, extending the bounds of reimagination beyond 'retreat' and beyond the site.

Keywords: Climate change adaptation; Disaster risk reduction; Land use change; Managed retreat; Planned relocation; Post-retreat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Functional typology of global origin sites (in colour)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Loss to reimagination: Spatial legacies of retreat

References

    1. Aiken, G., and L. Mabon. 2023. Where next for managed retreat: Bringing in history, community and under-researched places. Area. 10.1111/area.12890.
    1. Ajibade, I., M. Sullivan, C. Lower, L. Yarina, and A. Reilly. 2022. Are managed retreat programs successful and just? A global mapping of success typologies, justice dimensions, and trade-offs. Global Environmental Change. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102576.
    1. Bernard, L., M. Petterson, C. Schofield, and S. Kaye. 2021. Securing the limits of large ocean states in the pacific: defining baselines limits and boundaries amidst changing coastlines and sea level rise. Geosciences. 10.3390/geosciences11090394.
    1. Binder, S.B., L.A. Ritchie, R. Bender, A. Thiel, C.K. Baker, E. Badillo, S. Goodfellow, B. Kulp, et al. 2020. Limbo: The unintended consequences of home buyout programmes on peripheral communities. Environmental Hazards 19: 488–507. 10.1080/17477891.2020.1714537.
    1. Bronen, R. 2014. Climate displacement in the United States: The case of Newtok village. Alaska. In Land Solutions for Climate Displacement: Routledge.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources