Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar 25;22(3):e1004555.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004555. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Evaluation of postural therapy using lateral position according to fetal back orientation on breech presentation and breech recurrence (BRLT study): An open-label randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of postural therapy using lateral position according to fetal back orientation on breech presentation and breech recurrence (BRLT study): An open-label randomized controlled trial

Hiroki Shinmura et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background: In Japan, the lateral position method is known as a postural therapy for breech presentation wherein the mother lies down in lateral position according to the orientation of the fetal back. Few studies have formally tested lateral position management for breech presentation, and no method exists to prevent breech recurrence after cephalic version. We hypothesized that postural management comprising a combination of opposite-side lateral position for breech presentation and same-side lateral position after cephalic version demonstrates a clinically relevant effect size on breech presentation.

Methods and findings: We conducted a stratified, open-label randomized controlled trial at an academic hospital in Kawasaki, Japan. A total of 200 women diagnosed with breech presentation between 28 + 0 and 30 + 0 gestational weeks were randomized to postural management (n = 100) or control (no intervention, n = 100) group. The intervention was instruction every 2 weeks on lying in the lateral position on the opposite-side of fetal back for breech presentation and on the same-side of fetal back for head-first presentation. The primary outcome was the rate of fetuses in breech presentation at 37 weeks of gestation, and the secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, cesarean delivery for breech presentation, head presentation 2, 4, and 6 weeks later, breech presentation recurrence, and adverse events. Breech presentation rate at 37 gestational weeks was 11% in the intervention group, using the combination of the opposite-side and same-side lateral positions, compared with 19% in the control group. However, we found no statistical significance in the intention-to-treat analysis (11% [11/100] versus 19% [19/100]; relative risk, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.29 to 1.15]; p = 0.11). In the control group, 23 participants (23%) unknowingly took the same posture as the intervention group, and the prespecified per-protocol analysis excluding crossover found the same direction of effect but with statistical significance. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the intervention group had a higher cephalic version rate 2 weeks after the instruction (69% [69/100] versus 54% [54/100]; relative risk, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.96]; p = 0.029), and lower breech presentation recurrence rates (2% [2/91] versus 10% [9/88]; relative risk, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.048 to 0.97]; p = 0.031) than the control group. Regarding adverse events in the intervention group, three participants experienced discomfort and one participant complained of pain in the lateral abdomen; these symptoms resolved spontaneously.

Conclusions: For breech presentation at the beginning of the third trimester, providing postural therapy instruction on opposite-side lateral positioning and same-side lateral positioning was associated with 8% reduction of breech fetuses at 37 gestational weeks compared with the control group, but this primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance. Regarding the secondary endpoints, the intervention group showed a significantly higher rate of cephalic version after 2 weeks and lower rate of breech recurrence. The direction of the effect of postural therapy based on fetal back position on breech presentation was promising, and further research to validate this approach, with consideration for unplanned participant crossover, may be warranted.

Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000043613, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049800).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Opposite side lateral position for breech presentation:
(A) the right lateral recumbent position is taken if the fetal back is on the mother’s left side. (B) The left lateral recumbent position is taken if the fetal back is on the mother’s right side. Same side lateral position after cephalic version: (C) the right lateral recumbent position is taken if the fetal back is on the mother’s right side. (D) The left lateral recumbent position is taken if the fetal back is on the mother’s left side.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Flowchart of participant screening, enrollment, randomization, and inclusion in the analysis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Number 265, December 2001. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(1):65–6. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)80001-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carayol M, Blondel B, Zeitlin J, Breart G, Goffinet F. Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972-2003. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132(1):20–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hehir MP, O’Connor HD, Kent EM, Fitzpatrick C, Boylan PC, Coulter-Smith S, et al.. Changes in vaginal breech delivery rates in a single large metropolitan area. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):498.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sagawa K, Suzuki S, Takeda S, Kinoshita K. Trends in mode of breech delivery in Japan. Hypertens Res Preg. 2021;9:26–9.

Publication types