Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection for the identification of bacterial infections in clinical wound samples
- PMID: 40132411
- DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2025.127991
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection for the identification of bacterial infections in clinical wound samples
Abstract
Early detection of wound infections is critical for timely intervention and prevention of possible complications since prompt treatment can help lower pathogen spread and enhance faster healing. Early detection also helps reduce the risk of serious infections requiring extensive medical interventions or life-threatening diseases such as sepsis. Culture-based approaches currently used for bacterial identification have limited sensitivity and specificity. At the same time, they are time-consuming, resulting in delays in therapy and, therefore, having a negative impact on the treatment outcomes. Quantifying the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by bacteria residing in wounds is a promising, non-invasive option for detecting infections at early stages. This method allows for continuous monitoring without requiring invasive procedures, thereby reducing patient discomfort and the risk of further complications. Spectroscopy methods and sensors are the primary VOC detection and quantification approaches, but sensors are more rapid, cost-effective, non-invasive, and precise. This review highlights the significance of the early detection of wound infection to enable timely intervention and prevent complications, emphasizing the limitations of culture-based approaches. It also explores the potential of quantifying VOCs using different methods and discusses the correlation between their levels and the rate of bacterial infections in wounds. Additionally, the review evaluates current VOC-based monitoring methods for wound management, identifies gaps in the field, and advocates for further research to advance wound care and enhance patient outcomes.
Keywords: Bacterial infections; Chronic wounds; Sensor; VOC; Volatile organic compounds; Wound monitoring.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Volatile organic compound detection as a potential means of diagnosing cutaneous wound infections.Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Aug;25(4):574-590. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12563. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Wound Repair Regen. 2017. PMID: 28727229 Review.
-
In vitro volatile organic compound profiling using GC×GC-TOFMS to differentiate bacteria associated with lung infections: a proof-of-concept study.J Breath Res. 2016 Apr 27;10(2):026008. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/026008. J Breath Res. 2016. PMID: 27120170
-
Validation of biofilm formation on human skin wound models and demonstration of clinically translatable bacteria-specific volatile signatures.Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9431. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27504-z. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29930327 Free PMC article.
-
Ion mobility spectrometry for microbial volatile organic compounds: a new identification tool for human pathogenic bacteria.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Mar;93(6):2603-14. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-3924-4. Epub 2012 Feb 12. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012. PMID: 22327321 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting bacterial infections in wounds: a review of biosensors and wearable sensors in comparison with conventional laboratory methods.Analyst. 2022 May 3;147(9):1756-1776. doi: 10.1039/d2an00157h. Analyst. 2022. PMID: 35416199 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical