Periods of susceptibility for associations between phthalate exposure and preterm birth: Results from a pooled analysis of 16 US cohorts
- PMID: 40132438
- PMCID: PMC12021553
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109392
Periods of susceptibility for associations between phthalate exposure and preterm birth: Results from a pooled analysis of 16 US cohorts
Abstract
Background: Phthalate exposure during pregnancy has been associated with preterm birth, but mechanisms of action may depend on the timing of exposure.
Objective: Investigate critical periods of susceptibility during pregnancy for associations between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and preterm birth.
Methods: Individual-level data were pooled from 16 US cohorts (N = 6045, n = 539 preterm births). We examined trimester-averaged urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations. Most phthalate metabolites had 2248, 3703, and 3172 observations in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Our primary analysis used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations (GEE) under a multiple informant approach to estimate trimester-specific odds ratios (ORs) of preterm birth and significant (p < 0.20) heterogeneity in effect estimates by trimester. Adjusted models included interactions between each covariate and trimester.
Results: Differences in trimester-specific associations between phthalate metabolites and preterm birth were most evident for di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) metabolites. For example, an interquartile range increase in mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) during the first and second trimesters was associated with ORs of 1.15 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.33) and 1.11 (95 % CI: 0.97, 1.28) for preterm birth, respectively, but this association was null in the third trimester (OR = 0.91 [95 % CI: 0.76, 1.09]) (p-heterogeneity = 0.03).
Conclusion: The association of preterm birth with gestational biomarkers of DEHP exposure, but not other phthalate metabolites, differed by the timing of exposure. First and second trimester exposures demonstrated the greatest associations. Our study also highlights methodological considerations for critical periods of susceptibility analyses in pooled studies.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Dr. McElrath reported research support to their institution and equity from NxPrenatal Inc; serving on the scientific advisory board of and equity from Mirvie Inc; and serving on the scientific advisory board of and cash payment from Hoffmann-La Roche, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Comanche Biopharma; and Tectonic Therapeutic. Dr. Schmidt has received funding to support the MARBLES Study through a grant from the Simons Foundation (SFARI #863967, RJS). RJS consulted for the Beasley Law Firm and Linus Technology, Inc. RJS has received travel support to present at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS) and to serve on the Observational Study Monitoring Board (OSMB) for HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
