Anatomic Lung Resection Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Wedge Resection for Stage IA (≤2 cm) NSCLC
- PMID: 40132758
- PMCID: PMC12328121
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.03.042
Anatomic Lung Resection Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Wedge Resection for Stage IA (≤2 cm) NSCLC
Abstract
Introduction: Given the uncertain generalizability of recent clinical trial data, a comparative effectiveness analysis evaluating the long-term survival of "real world" patients may clarify the role of lobectomy and sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) in the treatment of early stage NSCLC.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing lung resection for clinical stage IA NSCLC (≤2 cm) between 2012 and 2022 were identified from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Long-term vital status was determined by linkage to the National Death Index and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Stabilized inverse probability weighted Cox regression was used to account for selection bias and derive hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals comparing the lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection cohorts.
Results: Overall, 32,340 patients with stage IA NSCLC (19,778 lobectomies [OS = 71.9% (5 y), 44.8% (10 y)], 4279 segmentectomies [OS = 69.6%, 44.2%], and 8283 wedge resections [OS = 66.3%, 41.4%]) were evaluated. After risk adjustment, lobectomy was associated with improved OS and LCSS compared with sublobar resection (HR [OS] = 0.87 [0.83-0.92]; HR [LCSS] = 0.84 [0.73-0.97]). Both lobectomy (HR [OS] = 0.84 [0.80-0.88]; HR [LCSS] = 0.72 [0.56-0.93]) and segmentectomy (HR [OS] = 0.88 [0.81-0.95]; HR [LCSS] = 0.77 [0.66-0.89]) were associated with improved survival compared with wedge resection. No differences in OS or LCSS were observed between lobectomy and segmentectomy.
Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, lobectomy and segmentectomy are associated with improved OS and LCSS compared with wedge resection for stage IA NSCLC (≤2 cm). These findings highlight the potential gap between trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness.
Keywords: Anatomic lung resection; Lung-cancer specific survival; Non–small cell lung cancer; Overall survival; Sublobar lung resection.
Copyright © 2025 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Dr. Towe reports serving as a consultant for Atricure, Arthrex, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Zimmer Biomet; receiving grant support from Zimmer and Intuitive Foundation; and receiving royalties from Zimmer Biomet. Drs. Puri and Kozower report receiving support from Intuitive Surgical. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Key Statistics for Lung Cancer 2024. (Accessed November 21, 2024; https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/lung-cancer/about/key-statistics.html)
-
- NCCN Guidelines (Accessed November 21, 2024; https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1)
-
- Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV, Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(3):615–22. - PubMed
-
- Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non–small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/ WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2022; 399:1607–1617. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous