Safety Net Hospitals and the Quality of Surgical Care
- PMID: 40134484
- PMCID: PMC11932591
- DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000553
Safety Net Hospitals and the Quality of Surgical Care
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the number of safety net hospitals (SNHs) that have American College of Surgeons (ACS) accreditation for surgical programs.
Background: SNHs provide healthcare to a substantial proportion of uninsured and underserved patient populations and rely heavily on public funding to sustain their operations. ACS accreditation emphasizes evidence-based care and standardization to improve patient outcomes. However, SNHs face financial and administrative barriers to ACS accreditation.
Methods: We investigated the number of SNHs with ACS accreditation for specific programs by utilizing the publicly available listing of ACS-accredited programs and the listing of SNHs from the America's Essential Hospitals membership. We then performed a descriptive analysis of the number and geographic distribution of SNHs within the United States and the number of SNHs with ACS-accredited programs.
Results: SNHs vary by regional disparities and demographic characteristics of respective states. Almost 20% of states are without access to SNHs. Most SNHs do not pursue ACS accreditation. Of 322 SNHs, 36% were accredited for cancer care (Commission on Cancer), 31% for trauma (Trauma Quality Improvement Program), 21% for bariatrics (Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program), 13% for breast care (National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers), and 5% for rectal cancer (National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer).
Conclusions: ACS accreditation can benefit SNHs in improving guideline-concordant care for medically underserved patients and SNHs should be encouraged to attain ACS accreditation to improve access to and quality of care for vulnerable patient populations.
Keywords: accreditation; quality; safety net hospitals; surgery.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Figures




References
-
- Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, et al. . Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:409–436. - PubMed
-
- Yoda S, Theeke LA. A scoping review of factors contributing to late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in racial and ethnic minority (African American and Hispanic) women. SAGE Open. 2022;12:215824402211402.
-
- German S, Agovino P, Ahmed M, et al. . Breast cancer disparities in screening age New Jersey women. New Jersey Department of Health; 2022:14.
-
- Miller ME, Bleicher RJ, Kaufman CS, et al. . Impact of breast center accreditation on compliance with breast quality performance measures at commission on cancer-accredited centers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1202–1211. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources