Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 7;69(5):e0004525.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00045-25. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

Vesicle inhibition reduces Candida biofilm resistance

Affiliations

Vesicle inhibition reduces Candida biofilm resistance

Min-Ju Kim et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Candida biofilm matrix components are delivered to the extracellular space by vesicles where they deposit and confer biofilm-associated drug resistance. Here, we present evidence that drugs designed to inhibit mammalian exosome production exhibit similar effects on C. albicans extracellular vesicles, ultimately eliminating biofilm matrix assembly. We find that vesicle reduction renders biofilm communities susceptible to the antifungal fluconazole. Our findings argue that vesicle trafficking pathways represent a promising target to optimize for recalcitrant fungal biofilms.

Keywords: Candida albicans; antifungal resistance; biofilms; extracellular matrix; vesicles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Impact of EV inhibitors on C. albicans biofilms. (A) The percent reduction in biofilm formation was measured using the XTT assay following treatment with either fluconazole (1,000  µg/mL) or a human EV inhibitor (8 µg/mL) [simvastatin, omeprazole, imipramine, indomethacin, or glyburide] alone or combined, compared to untreated biofilms. Each dot represents an independent biological replicate and reflects the mean of three technical replicates. Error bars denote standard deviation. A nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with an uncorrected Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed. Indicated P values: *, P <0.05; **, P <0.01; ***, P <0.005; ****. (B) Quantification of in vivo biofilms using the rat central venous catheter model following antifungal therapy with either fluconazole (250  µg/mL) or a human EV inhibitor (32  µg/mL) [simvastatin or omeprazole] alone or in combination, compared to 0.9 M NaCl followed by the CFU analysis. Three animals and culture replicates per condition, n = 3. Error bars represent standard deviation. Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with uncorrected Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed. Indicated P values, *, P, 0.05; **, P, 0.01; ***, P, 0.005; ****. (C) SEM of C. albicans biofilms grown on coverslips in control and human EV inhibitor-treated biofilms (8  µg/mL) [omeprazole, simvastatin, or imipramine]. Arrows highlight the blue pseudocolored extracellular matrix. Scale bars: 40 µm. (D) Quantitative analysis of EV concentration in C. albicans biofilms in a 6-well biofilm assay using NTA following treatment with a human EV inhibitor (8 µg/mL) [simvastatin, omeprazole, or imipramine]. Each dot represents an independent biological replicate and reflects the mean of three technical replicates. Error bars denote standard deviation. A nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with an uncorrected Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed, with a significant P value indicated *, P, 0.05; **, P, 0.01; ***, P, 0.005; ****. (E) The percent reduction in biofilm formation was measured using the XTT assay following treatment with fluconazole (1,000  µg/mL) plus a human EV inhibitor (8 µg/mL) [simvastatin or omeprazole] alone or combined with C. albicans biofilm EVs (4.3 × 106 ± 1.4 × 105 particles/mL) after 48 h of growth. Each dot represents an independent biological replicate and reflects the mean of three technical replicates. Error bars denote standard deviation. A nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with an uncorrected Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed, with a significant P value indicated *, P, 0.05; **, P, 0.01; ***, P, 0.005; ****.

References

    1. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA. 2001. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol 183:5385–5394. doi:10.1128/JB.183.18.5385-5394.2001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kojic EM, Darouiche RO. 2003. Comparison of adherence of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis to silicone catheters in vitro and in vivo. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:684–690. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00724.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Sobel JD, Pappas PG, Kullberg BJ, Mycoses Study Group . 2012. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis 54:1110–1122. doi:10.1093/cid/cis021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarnowski R, Westler WM, Lacmbouh GA, Marita JM, Bothe JR, Bernhardt J, Lounes-Hadj Sahraoui A, Fontaine J, Sanchez H, Hatfield RD, Ntambi JM, Nett JE, Mitchell AP, Andes DR. 2014. Novel entries in a fungal biofilm matrix encyclopedia. mBio 5:e01333-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.01333-14 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources