Automated CT Image Processing for the Diagnosis, Prediction, and Differentiation of Phenotypes in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
- PMID: 40136064
- DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70137
Automated CT Image Processing for the Diagnosis, Prediction, and Differentiation of Phenotypes in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation
Erratum in
-
Correction to Clinical Transplantation Articles.Clin Transplant. 2025 Apr;39(4):e70158. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70158. Clin Transplant. 2025. PMID: 40232868 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation is a common complication with a poor prognosis. We assessed the utility of quantitative computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis, prediction, and discrimination of CLAD phenotypes.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed routine inspiratory and expiratory CT scans from 78 patients at different time points after lung transplantation. Mean lung density (MLD), parametric response mapping (PRM), percentage of air trapping, and airway wall morphology parameters were calculated using the image processing software YACTA. Diagnostic and predictive utility was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis and Pearson correlation.
Results: Markers of air trapping showed promise for the diagnosis and prediction of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS); for example, expiratory MLD showed areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.905 for diagnosis and 0.729 for 1-year prediction. For diagnosis of CLAD with mixed phenotype, peripheral measurements (e.g., PRM of peripheral functional small airway disease: AUC 0.893) were most suitable. Markers of airway thickening (e.g., expiratory wall thickness at an inner perimeter of 10 mm: AUC 0.767) gave good diagnostic values for the undefined phenotype. CT biomarkers differed significantly among CLAD phenotypes.
Conclusions: Different CT biomarkers are suitable for the diagnosis of CLAD phenotypes, prediction of BOS, and differentiation of CLAD phenotypes.
Keywords: CLAD; LuTX; diagnosis; prediction.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- D. C. Chambers, M. Perch, A. Zuckermann, et al., “The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty‐Eighth Adult Lung Transplantation Report ‐ 2021; Focus on Recipient Characteristics,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 40, no. 10 (2021): 1060–1072.
-
- D. C. Chambers, W. S. Cherikh, M. O. Harhay, et al., “The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty‐Sixth Adult Lung and Heart‐Lung Transplantation Report‐2019; Focus Theme: Donor and Recipient Size Match,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 38, no. 10 (2019): 1042–1055.
-
- P. Hota, C. Dass, M. Kumaran, and S. Simpson, “High‐Resolution CT Findings of Obstructive and Restrictive Phenotypes of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: More Than Just Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome,” AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 211, no. 1 (2018): W13–W21.
-
- G. M. Verleden, A. R. Glanville, E. D. Lease, et al., “Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Definition, Diagnostic Criteria, and Approaches to Treatment–A Consensus Report From the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 38, no. 5 (2019): 493–503.
-
- A. Van Herck, H. Beeckmans, P. Kerckhof, et al., “Prognostic Value of Chest CT Findings at BOS Diagnosis in Lung Transplant Recipients,” Transplantation 107, no. 11 (2023): e292–e304.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
