Clean Versus Sterile: Management of Chronic Wounds
- PMID: 40136098
- DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000001159
Clean Versus Sterile: Management of Chronic Wounds
Abstract
There is insufficient conclusive evidence to provide definitive guidance for the use of clean versus sterile technique in the management of chronic wounds. This article reviews the evolution of evidence and practices for sterile versus clean management of chronic wounds. It is an update of documents developed in 2001 and updated in 2012. It summarizes the work of a task force of APIC and WOCN members and provides an evidence-based perspective on the ongoing debate between clean and sterile techniques in chronic wound management.
Copyright © 2025 by the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society.
References
-
- Wooten MK, Hawkins K. Clean versus sterile: management of chronic wounds. Article. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2001;28(5):A24–A26. doi:10.1067/mjw.2001.118431. - DOI
-
- Purssell E, Gallagher R, Gould D. Aseptic versus clean technique during wound management? Systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Int J Environ Health Res. 2023;34(3):1580-1591. doi:10.1080/09603123.2023.2229758. - DOI
-
- WOCN Society. Clean vs. sterile dressing techniques for management of chronic wounds: a fact sheet. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39:(2S). S30–S34. doi:10.1097/WON.0b013e3182478e06. - DOI
-
- Beitz J. Wound healing. In: McNichol L, Ratliff C, Yates S, eds. Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society Core Curriculum: Wound Management. 2nd edition. Wolters Kluwer; 2022:39-55.
-
- Swanson T, Ousey K, Haesler E, et al. IWII wound infection in clinical practice consensus document: 2022 update. J Wound Care. 2022;31(Sup12):S10–s21. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup12.S10. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
