Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 10;32(3):155.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030155.

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Multifactorial Risk Assessment and Communication for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring Implementation in Canada

Affiliations

Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Multifactorial Risk Assessment and Communication for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study Exploring Implementation in Canada

Meghan J Walker et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Many jurisdictions are considering a shift to risk-stratified breast cancer screening; however, evidence on the feasibility of implementing it on a population scale is needed. We conducted a prospective cohort study in the PERSPECTIVE I&I project to produce evidence on risk-stratified breast screening and recruited 3753 participants to undergo multifactorial risk assessment from 2019-2021. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of study personnel on barriers and facilitators to delivering multifactorial risk assessment and risk communication. One focus group and three one-on-one interviews were conducted and a thematic analysis conducted which identified five themes: (1) barriers and facilitators to recruitment for multifactorial risk assessment, (2) barriers and facilitators to completion of the risk factor questionnaire, (3) additional resources required to implement multifactorial risk assessment, (4) the need for a person-centered approach, and (5) and risk literacy. While risk assessment and communication processes were successful overall, key barriers were identified including challenges with collecting comprehensive breast cancer risk factor information and limited resources to execute data collection and risk communication activities on a large scale. Risk assessment and communication processes will need to be optimized for large-scale implementation to ensure they are efficient but robust and person-centered.

Keywords: barriers; breast cancer screening; implementation; personalized screening; qualitative research; risk-stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Antonis C. Antoniou, Tim Carver, and Douglas F. Easton are creators of BOADICEA, which has been licensed to Cambridge Enterprise (University of Cambridge). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Themes and subthemes mapped to the multifactorial risk assessment pathway.

References

    1. Arnold M., Morgan E., Rumgay H., Mafra A., Singh D., Laversanne M., Vignat J., Gralow J.R., Cardoso F., Siesling S., et al. Current and Future Burden of Breast Cancer: Global Statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast Edinb. Scotl. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klarenbach S., Sims-Jones N., Lewin G., Singh H., Thériault G., Tonelli M., Doull M., Courage S., Garcia A.J., Thombs B.D., et al. Recommendations on Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Aged 40–74 Years Who Are Not at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2018;190:E1441–E1451. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180463. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henderson J.T., Webber E.M., Weyrich M.S., Miller M., Melnikow J. Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2024;331:1931–1946. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25844. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marmot M.G., Altman D.G., Cameron D.A., Dewar J.A., Thompson S.G., Wilcox M. The Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: An Independent Review. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;108:2205–2240. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening The Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: An Independent Review. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2012;380:1778–1786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources