Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 28;13(3):108.
doi: 10.3390/dj13030108.

The Effect of MRI Exposure on the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Bracket Types

Affiliations

The Effect of MRI Exposure on the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Bracket Types

Luka Šimunović et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in diagnostics, but its effects on orthodontic materials remain a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of MRI exposure at 1.5 T and 3 T on the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of different orthodontic bracket types (metal, self-ligating, and ceramic). Methods: A total of 90 extracted human premolars were divided into three groups (control, 1.5 T, and 3 T MRI exposure). The three bracket types were bonded using Transbond XT adhesive and subjected to standardized polymerization. MRI scans were conducted using 1.5 T and 3 T machines with clinically relevant sequences. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and the ARI was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Results: MRI exposure influenced SBS and the ARI differently across bracket types. Firstly, 3 T MRI exposure significantly reduced SBS in self-ligating (p = 0.017) and ceramic brackets (p = 0.014) compared to the control, whereas metal brackets showed no significant changes. ARI scores varied across MRI conditions, with metal and self-ligating brackets showing increased adhesive retention at higher field strengths. No significant differences were observed in ARI scores for ceramic brackets across MRI conditions. Conclusions: The clinical importance of understanding these results is that both patients and clinicians must be aware of inevitable changes that occur in SBS during MRI, since exposure to high-field MRI, particularly 3 T, may alter bond strength and adhesive failure characteristics.

Keywords: adhesive remnant index; magnetic resonance imaging; orthodontic brackets; shear bond strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SBS among different bracket types and MRI exposure; bolded * indicates statistically significant data p < 0.05.

References

    1. Bishara S.E., VonWald L., Olsen M.E., Laffoon J.F. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1999;116:616–620. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70195-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. AlSamak S., Alsaleem N.R., Ahmed M.K. Evaluation of the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of color change, fluorescent, and conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study. Int. Orthod. 2023;21:100712. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100712. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henkin F.S., Macêdo É.O., Santos K.D., Schwarzbach M., Samuel S.M., Mundstock K.S. In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of different metal brackets. Dental Press J. Orthod. 2016;21:67–73. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.067-073.oar. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arash V., Naghipour F., Ravadgar M., Karkhah A., Barati M.S. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives. Electron. Physician. 2017;9:3584–3591. doi: 10.19082/3584. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilal R., Arjumand B. Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and Nano Adhesives: A Comparative In-Vitro Study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2019;10:600–604. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_842_18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources