Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 10;13(3):198.
doi: 10.3390/toxics13030198.

Evaluation of Ecotoxicity in Waste Leachate: A Current Status of Bioassay and Chemical Analysis

Lia Kim  1 , Jin Il Kwak  1 , Youn-Joo An  1
Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of Ecotoxicity in Waste Leachate: A Current Status of Bioassay and Chemical Analysis

Lia Kim et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

As global waste generation increases, waste toxicity has become a significant global issue. Among various hazardous properties, ecotoxicity refers to the risks that waste may pose to the environment. It is evaluated through aquatic bioassays to assess the effects of leaching contaminants, as well as through soil assessments where waste is buried. To clarify these issues, this study collected waste leaching methods from international organizations and various countries and analyzed case studies of bioassays for waste leachates. The criteria for determining the ecotoxicity of waste leachates were also reviewed, revealing inconsistencies in leaching methods across the European Union, the United States, Canada, and Asian countries. Additionally, various bioassays were applied to assess waste leachates, further contributing to inconsistencies. Given these variations, we recommend developing a unified leaching method, standardized bioassays, and consistent criteria for assessing the toxicity of waste leachates.

Keywords: bioassay; ecotoxicity; leachate; waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Saxena N., Sarkar B., Singh S.R. Selection of remanufacturing/production cycles with an alternative market: A perspective on waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;245:118935. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118935. - DOI
    1. Lu M., Zhou C., Wang C., Jackson R.B., Kempes C.P. Worldwide scaling of waste generation in urban systems. Nat. Cities. 2025;1:126–135. doi: 10.1038/s44284-023-00021-5. - DOI
    1. EC (European Commission) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. OJEU L312,22.11.2008. EC; Brussels, Belgium: 2008. p. 3130.
    1. EC (European Commission) Council Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 2017 Amending Annex III to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Hazardous Property HP 14 ‘Ecotoxic’ (Text with EEA Relevance). OJ L 150. EC; Brussels, Belgium: 2017. pp. 1–4.
    1. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Laws and Regulations, Title 40. Protection of Environment, Part 261. Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste, Subpart C. Characteristics of Hazardous Waste. USEPA; Washington, DC, USA: 2017.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources