Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3;14(3):248.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens14030248.

Assessment of Microbiological Contamination and Prevalence of Pathogenic Strains in Cattle Carcasses from Romanian Slaughterhouses

Affiliations

Assessment of Microbiological Contamination and Prevalence of Pathogenic Strains in Cattle Carcasses from Romanian Slaughterhouses

Dariana-Olivia Brătfelan et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Food safety, particularly within the meat industry, is a significant concern addressed under the One Health concept, emphasizing the necessity of enhanced surveillance and hygiene protocols to mitigate contamination risks. This study assessed microbiological risks in Romanian bovine slaughterhouses by analyzing 150 samples from stool and carcasses at the post-evisceration and cooling stages over seven months in two abattoirs, using standardized microbiological methods and PCR to quantify aerobic colony counts (ACCs), Enterobacteriaceae, and pathogens (E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Listeria spp.). ACCs and Enterobacteriaceae levels decreased significantly [p < 0.05] during processing, highlighting effective hygiene measures. Pathogenic E. coli was identified in 14% of fecal samples and 5% of carcasses, indicating cross-contamination risks. Salmonella spp. were found in 28% of fecal samples but absent on carcasses, suggesting successful containment. Listeria spp. were rare and not detected on carcasses. PCR confirmed the presence of pathogenic strains in stool samples, emphasizing the need for strict hygiene practices and regular monitoring to improve meat safety and protect public health. In conclusion, the prevalence of E. coli, particularly serogroups like O101 and O26, and the absence of Salmonella and Listeria in carcass samples reflect both regional differences in pathogenic strains and the need for comprehensive, multi-stage control measures. Further studies should broaden pathogen surveillance to include more E. coli serogroups and implement stricter hygiene protocols to prevent cross-contamination during evisceration, skinning, and cooling. Regular monitoring of Salmonella and Listeria, especially in silage-fed cattle regions, along with improved coordination across the food production, health, and environmental sectors, is essential to mitigate contamination risks and safeguard public health.

Keywords: bovine slaughterhouses; cross-contamination; meat safety; pathogen detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of aerobic colony counts (ACCs) and Enterobacteriaceae levels in the two main steps assessed (post-evisceration and cooling); a—ACC values (log CFU/cm−2) in the post-evisceration steps and cooling stage; b—Enterobacteriaceae levels (log CFU/cm−2) in the post-evisceration steps and cooling stage.

References

    1. Rodríguez-Melcón C., Alonso-Calleja C., Capita R. The One Health approach in food safety: Challenges and opportunities. Food Front. 2024;5:1837–1865. doi: 10.1002/fft2.458. - DOI
    1. Priyashantha H., Vidanarachchi J.K. Perspectives on value chain transformation towards resilient animal-source food systems in Sri Lanka. Cogent Food Agric. 2024;10:2384329. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2024.2384329. - DOI
    1. Laukkanen-Ninios R., Ghidini S., Gómez Laguna J., Langkabel N., Santos S., Maurer P., Meemken D., Alban L., Alvseike O., Vieira-Pinto M. Additional post-mortem inspection procedures and laboratory methods as supplements for visual meat inspection of finishing pigs in Europe—Use and variability. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2022;17:363–375. doi: 10.1007/s00003-022-01391-z. - DOI
    1. Holcomb D.A., Stewart J.R. Microbial Indicators of Fecal Pollution: Recent Progress and Challenges in Assessing Water Quality. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2020;7:311–324. doi: 10.1007/s40572-020-00278-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Oliveira C.A.F., Da Cruz A.G., Tavolaro P., Corassin C.H. Antimicrobial Food Packaging. Volume 10. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2016. Chapter 10—Food Safety: Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOP), Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) pp. 129–139. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources