Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 24;18(6):767-781.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.11.037.

Initial Experience and Bench Validation of the CLEVE Prosthetic Leaflet Modification Procedure During Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Procedures

Affiliations

Initial Experience and Bench Validation of the CLEVE Prosthetic Leaflet Modification Procedure During Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Procedures

Amar Krishnaswamy et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. .

Abstract

Background: Some patients with failing surgical aortic or mitral valves are anatomically unsuitable for typical valve-in-valve procedures due to threatened coronary artery or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, respectively.

Objectives: The authors assessed the clinical and benchtop efficacy of the novel CLEVE (CLEveland Valve Electrosurgery) leaflet modification technique in patients with the previous concerns.

Methods: Eight patients with degenerated aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 6 patients with mitral valve replacement (MVR) at high risk for obstruction of left main coronary artery (AVR) or left ventricular outflow tract (MVR) were treated. The threatening prosthetic leaflet was punctured using electrosurgical techniques and dilated progressively, followed by deployment of a balloon-expandable valve into the modified leaflet. Benchtop analyses were performed using the same techniques to assess the response of the surgical leaflet ex vivo.

Results: Successful leaflet clearance was achieved in all without evidence of ostial coronary artery obstruction (AVR) or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (MVR). One patient experienced left main trunk obstruction due to suspected embolization of material that was treated percutaneously (patient expired due to further complications). No other complications at 30 days. On the benchtop, the procedure demonstrated complete clearance of the threatening leaflet, with detachment from one of the surgical posts in the AVR model and splitting across the leaflet edge in the MVR model.

Conclusions: Patients with a degenerated surgical valve who are unsuitable for a valve-in-valve replacement due to anatomic concerns regarding displacement of the index prosthetic leaflet can be successfully treated after using the CLEVE method of leaflet modification. Further studies of the procedure should be considered.

Keywords: TAVR; coronary obstruction; leaflet modification; left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; transcatheter mitral valve replacement; valve-in-valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Ms Gill was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr Harb has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Miyasaka has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr Sellers has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Anteris, and Excision Medical; and received research support from Medtronic, Vivitro Labs, Edwards Lifesciences, and HeartFlow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources