Networking between hospitals
- PMID: 40140018
- PMCID: PMC11946965
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02827-5
Networking between hospitals
Abstract
Not all hospitals have the resources to manage trauma patients, which is why many countries have introduced trauma systems to connect hospitals within specific regions. When definitive care cannot be provided at a hospital, the patient should be transferred to the closest appropriate facility with the necessary resources and capabilities. Telecommunication is a critical tool for data exchange (e.g., imaging) and multidisciplinary consultations. Ideally, a unified telecommunication system should be implemented across all hospitals in a network, with the long-term goal of nationwide or even European-level standardisation. While criteria for onward transfer vary slightly between trauma systems across countries, they can be adapted to meet the needs of any healthcare system. Decisions regarding patient transfer should be based on objective, prospectively agreed criteria. In addition, a common European trauma registry is essential to evaluate quality of care.
Keywords: ESTES; Polytrauma; Whitebook.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- American College of Surgeons. The Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support®. Student Course Manual. 10th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2018.
-
- Fletcher B, et al. Analysis of an American college of surgeons committee on trauma (ACS-COT) approved pilot project: increasing provider communication during interhospital transfer. J Trauma Nurs. 2000;7(2):51–6. - PubMed
-
- Latif R, et al. Telemedicine and telepresence for trauma and emergency care management. Scand J Surg. 2007;96(1):31–7. - PubMed
-
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie. Weißbuch Schwerverletztenversorgung. 3rd ed. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie; 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
