Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 26;20(1):316.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05689-0.

The effect of preoperative ultrasound localization on the incidence of infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve injury after hamstring tendon harvesting

Tianli Du  1 , Jianfeng Chen  1 , Chao Yan  1 , Hongzhi Fang  1 , Zhenghui Shang  2
Affiliations

The effect of preoperative ultrasound localization on the incidence of infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve injury after hamstring tendon harvesting

Tianli Du et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: The potential of ultrasound-guided labelling of the inferior patellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) to reduce IPBSN injury during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has not been explored. The primary objective of this retrospective cohort analysis was to assess whether intraoperative hamstring tendon harvesting avoiding the marked IPBSN would be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative skin sensory disturbances and the mean area of sensory disturbances.

Methods and analysis: A retrospective cohort study involving 60 patients who underwent autograft ACLR at Yichang Central People's Hospital from October 2020 to October 2024 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the use of preoperative ultrasound localization of the IPBSN, including the nonultrasound localization group (control group) and the ultrasound localization group (experimental group), with 30 patients in each group. The control group underwent standard ACLR with a diagonal incision for hamstring tendon harvesting, whereas the experimental group underwent preoperative ultrasound-guided localization of the IPBSN to avoid the nerve during incision. The primary outcome measures include the incidence of skin sensory disturbances and the average sensory disturbance area. The secondary outcomes include the Lysholm score and VAS score at the 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Results: The incidence of skin sensory disturbances in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the average area of sensory disturbance was smaller in the experimental group (P < 0.05). At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, no statistically significant differences in the Lysholm knee scores or visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were noted between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Preoperative ultrasound-guided localization of the IPBSN can reduce the risk of nerve injury during ACLR. The ultrasound-guided approach leads to a lower incidence of sensory disturbances and a smaller average area of sensory disturbance. IPBSN injury was not related to anterior knee pain or knee ROM limitations. Patients can choose whether to use ultrasound localization before surgery according to their needs. The study protocol adhered to strict standards of ethical conduct and patient safety. The results of this trial are expected to provide valuable insights into the prevention of injury to the IPBSN during hamstring tendon harvesting.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring tendon; Infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve; Sensory deficit; Ultrasound guidance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This trial was approved by the ethics committee of Hubei Hospital, and inpatients who met the inclusion criteria and diagnostic requirements were eligible for this study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative ultrasound-guided localisation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurement of sensory disturbance in the skin after surgery
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, et al. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL treatment consensus group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(8):2390–402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park JG, Han SB, Lee CS, et al. Anatomy, biomechanics, and reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee joint. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(6):786. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu W, Liu D, Cai Z, et al. Internal brace augmentation reconstruction versus standard anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled clinical trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2023;13(12): e065254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grassi A, Perdisa F, Samuelsson K, et al. Association between incision technique for hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the risk of injury to the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(8):2410–23. - PubMed
    1. Tavakoli Darestani R, Bagherian Lemraski MM, Hosseinpour M, et al. Electrophysiological assessment of injury to the infra-patellar branch(es) of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using medial hamstring auto-grafts: vertical versus oblique harvest site incisions. Arch Trauma Res. 2013;2(3):118–23. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources