Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):351.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07482-7.

Independent risk factors for placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dexin Chen  1 , Xuelin Gao  1 , Tingyue Yang  1 , Xing Xin  1 , Guohua Wang  1 , Hong Wang  1 , Rongxia He  2 , Min Liu  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Independent risk factors for placental abruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dexin Chen et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Placental abruption is one of the most severe complications during pregnancy, and its associated risk factors remain incompletely understood and somewhat controversial.

Methods: This study conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to collect literature related to placental abruption, with a cutoff date of July 30, 2024.

Results: A total of 54 observational studies were included, covering 7,267,241 pregnant women, with 47,702 cases diagnosed with placental abruption. The study identified three categories of independent risk factors: The first category includes baseline maternal characteristics (18 items), such as maternal age ≥ 35 years, black race, low prepregnancy BMI (< 18.5 kg/m²), unmarried status, smoking during pregnancy, alcohol consumption, inadequate prenatal care (< 4 visits), marijuana use, multiple pregnancy, parity ≥ 3, anemia (hemoglobin < 11 g/dL), previous placental abruption, previous cesarean section, previous miscarriage, previous stillbirth, cervical incompetence, habitual abortions, and assisted reproductive technology. Among these, previous placental abruption (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI [2.16, 3.42]) was found to be the most significant risk factor. The second category includes pregnancy-related complications (7 items), such as preterm premature rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, small for gestational age, polyhydramnios, antepartum hemorrhage, gestational hypertension, and placenta previa. Of these, placenta previa (AOR = 7.31, 95% CI [4.78, 11.19]) was identified as the most significant risk factor. The third category consists of other independent risk factors (33 items) and protective factors (3 items). However, methodological inconsistencies and publication bias in the current studies may affect the reliability of the meta-analysis results.

Conclusion: This study summarizes 58 independent risk factors for placental abruption, covering various aspects such as maternal baseline characteristics and pregnancy complications. For these high-risk populations, it is essential to strengthen the frequency of prenatal check-ups, establish early warning systems, and provide targeted health guidance. Future research should further refine risk factor models and develop more targeted preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of placental abruption and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Prospero: CRD42024546514.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: Independent risk factors; Meta-analysis; Placental abruption; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Literature screening flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
NOS scores
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk factors associated with maternal baseline characteristics
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Risk factors related to pregnancy complications
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Funnel Plot (A. Maternal Age≥35 Years; B. Smoking During Pregnancy; C. Gestational Hypertension; D. Preeclampsia)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Polyhydramnios at Term in Gestational Diabetes: Should We Be Concerned?
    Horcas-Martín M, Luque-Patiño T, Usandizaga-Prat C, Díaz-Fernández E, Melero-Jiménez V, Vázquez-Fonseca L, Visiedo F, Broullón-Molanes JR, Quintero-Prado R, Bugatto F. Horcas-Martín M, et al. Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;12(7):920. doi: 10.3390/children12070920. Children (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40723113 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Tikkanen M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(2):140–9. - PubMed
    1. Riihimäki O, Paavonen J, Luukkaala T, Gissler M, Metsäranta M, Andersson S, et al. Mortality and causes of death among women with a history of placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(11):1315–21. - PubMed
    1. Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED, Maternal. Labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with placental abruption: A systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(10):935–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ushiro S, Suzuki H, Ueda S. Japan obstetric compensation system for cerebral palsy: strategic system of data aggregation, investigation, amelioration and no-fault compensation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(3):493–513. - PubMed
    1. Okoth K, Chandan JS, Marshall T, Thangaratinam S, Thomas GN, Nirantharakumar K, et al. Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review. BMJ (Clinical Res ed). 2020;371:m3502. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources