Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 26;23(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01229-0.

Building Resilient and Responsive Health Research Systems:Responses and the Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Affiliations
Review

Building Resilient and Responsive Health Research Systems:Responses and the Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Mark Embrett et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the crucial role of robust health research systems (HRSs) in supporting effective public health responses. Understanding the responses and lessons learned from HRS during the pandemic is vital for future preparedness.

Methods: This environmental scan examined high income Countries with a HRS that responded to the COVID-19 pandemic using both academic and grey literature sources to gather comprehensive insights into these areas. The analysis was structured using an organizing framework to facilitate systematic extraction and synthesis of relevant information. A total of 5336 sources were identified of which 3609 were screened following duplicate removal. A total of 117 full-text sources were reviewed leading to 65 being included.

Findings: Effective interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaborations significantly enhanced the capacity to respond to the pandemic. Clear and streamlined governance structures were essential for coordinated efforts across various entities, facilitating swift decision-making and resource allocation. The robustness of pre-existing research infrastructures played a crucial role in the rapid mobilization of resources and execution of large-scale research projects. Knowledge mobilization efforts were vital in disseminating research findings promptly to inform public health responses. Continuous tracking and evaluation of health research activities enabled real-time adjustments and informed decision-making. Rapid identification and funding of research priorities, including vaccine and therapeutic development, were critical in addressing urgent public health needs. Effective resource allocation and capacity-building efforts ensured focused and accelerated research responses. Comprehensive strategic planning, involving stakeholder engagement and robust monitoring tools, was essential for aligning research efforts with health system needs.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the necessity of flexible funding mechanisms, enhanced data-sharing practices and robust strategic planning to prepare for future health emergencies. Policy implications emphasize the need for sustained investments in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and the development of comprehensive governance frameworks. Research implications highlight the importance of community engagement and interdisciplinary partnerships. For decision-makers, the study stresses the importance of rapid response mechanisms and evidence-based policy making. Health research systems must prioritize maintaining adaptable infrastructures and strategic planning to ensure effective crisis response. Despite potential biases and the rapidly evolving context, this comprehensive analysis provides valuable lessons for strengthening HRSs to address future public health challenges.

Keywords: COVID-19; Health research systems; Interdisciplinary collaboration; Pandemic response; Strategic planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This review did not include data from human participants. Ethics approval was not required. Consent for publications: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Government of Canada CI of HR. CIHR Strategic Plan 2021–2031-CIHR. 2021. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/52331.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2024.
    1. Government of Canada CI of HR. Centre for research on pandemic preparedness and health emergencies-Why at CIHR?-CIHR. 2022. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/52827.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2024.
    1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. - PubMed
    1. Peters MD, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: E A, Z M, editors. JBI Man Evid Synth. 2020. - PubMed
    1. Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2119–26. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources