Hip implant infection. Treatment with resection arthroplasty and late total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 4014283
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90389-4
Hip implant infection. Treatment with resection arthroplasty and late total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
In 131 patients with an infected hip implant, treatment was surgical excision of the implant (resection arthroplasty) and delayed reconstruction with a total hip arthroplasty. Most of the patients had low-grade infections: only 5 percent had a temperature of 37.8 degrees C or higher and only 20 percent had wound drainage. Hip pain was the primary symptom of a deep infection in 90 percent. Staphylococci were the most frequently isolated causal organisms, recovered from deep tissue specimens in 84 patients. The hip was reconstructed six days to 32 years (mode, 429 days) after resection arthroplasty. At follow-up two to nine years after reconstruction, 88 percent of the 131 patients were free of infection. Recurrent sepsis was more common (p less than 0.05) in patients with incomplete acrylic cement removal or patients in whom reconstruction was performed less than 429 days after resection arthroplasty. Risk of recurrent sepsis was increased when gram-negative bacilli in pure or mixed cultures were found, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Similar articles
-
Total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of adult hips with current or quiescent sepsis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Feb;63(2):194-200. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981. PMID: 7462276
-
Salvage of infected total joint replacements.Arch Surg. 1977 May;112(5):574-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370050034005. Arch Surg. 1977. PMID: 856100
-
Excision arthroplasty with delayed wound closure for the infected total hip replacement.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978 Nov-Dec;(137):106-11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978. PMID: 743813
-
Megaprostheses in the Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Series and Literature Review.Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):229-32. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015. PMID: 26630464 Review.
-
Infections of hip prostheses and artificial joints.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;3(2):329-38. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2663985 Review.
Cited by
-
Reappraisal of the antistaphylococcal activities of first-generation (narrow-spectrum) and second-generation (expanded-spectrum) cephalosporins.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Apr;33(4):407-11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.4.407. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989. PMID: 2658789 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Does cemented or cementless single-stage exchange arthroplasty of chronic periprosthetic hip infections provide similar infection rates to a two-stage? A systematic review.BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1869-4. BMC Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27724919 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro interactions between bacteria, osteoblast-like cells and macrophages in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections.PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024827. Epub 2011 Sep 13. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21931858 Free PMC article.
-
What is the evidence base to guide surgical treatment of infected hip prostheses? systematic review of longitudinal studies in unselected patients.BMC Med. 2012 Feb 16;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-18. BMC Med. 2012. PMID: 22340795 Free PMC article.
-
Purification and characterization of the staphylococcal slime-associated antigen and its occurrence among Staphylococcus epidermis clinical isolates.Infect Immun. 1996 Aug;64(8):3410-5. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.8.3410-3415.1996. Infect Immun. 1996. PMID: 8757885 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources