Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 12:19:1548478.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1548478. eCollection 2025.

Neuroplastic effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): from mechanisms to clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Neuroplastic effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): from mechanisms to clinical trials

Desmond Agboada et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique with the potential for inducing neuroplasticity and enhancing cognitive and clinical outcomes. A unique feature of tACS, compared to other stimulation modalities, is that it modulates brain activity by entraining neural activity and oscillations to an externally applied alternating current. While many studies have focused on online effects during stimulation, growing evidence suggests that tACS can induce sustained after-effects, which emphasizes the potential to induce long-term neurophysiological changes, essential for therapeutic applications. In the first part of this review, we discuss how tACS after-effects could be mediated by four non-mutually exclusive mechanisms. First, spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), where the timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes strengthens or weakens synaptic connections. Second, spike-phase coupling and oscillation phase as mediators of plasticity. Third, homeostatic plasticity, emphasizing the importance of neural activity to operate within dynamic physiological ranges. Fourth, state-dependent plasticity, which highlights the importance of the current brain state in modulatory effects of tACS. In the second part of this review, we discuss tACS applications in clinical trials targeting neurological and psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Evidence suggests that repeated tACS sessions, optimized for individual oscillatory frequencies and combined with behavioral interventions, may result in lasting effects and enhance therapeutic outcomes. However, critical challenges remain, including the need for personalized dosing, improved current modeling, and systematic investigation of long-term effects. In conclusion, this review highlights the mechanisms and translational potential of tACS, emphasizing the importance of bridging basic neuroscience and clinical research to optimize its use as a therapeutic tool.

Keywords: clinical trials; long-term effects; neuroplasticity; repeated stimulation; tACS (transcranial alternating current stimulation).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential neuroplasticity mechanisms related to the after-effects of tACS. Effects of tACS are shown by the blue arrows. Left: TACS applied in a frequency that is at or slightly below that of endogenous rhythms may result in long-term potentiation (LTP) as it promotes the natural sequence of pre-synaptic firing preceding post-synaptic firing. TACS that is at a higher frequency than endogenous rhythms may result in long-term depression (LTD) as it promotes post-synaptic firing that precedes pre-synaptic firing. Middle: Homeostatic properties affect the efficacy of tACS. If neural oscillations or firing synchrony is already increased tACS may not be able push this effect further and may result in homeostatic plasticity where the opposite effect is observed. Right: The current brain state also determines efficacy of tACS. While some in some physiological or behavioral state tACS may result in large changes, other psychological/behavioral states may prevent tACS from having a strong effect.

References

    1. Abraham W. C. (2008). Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:387. doi: 10.1038/nrn2356 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agboada D., Mosayebi Samani M., Jamil A., Kuo M.-F., Nitsche M. A. (2019). Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Sci Rep 9:18185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54621-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agboada D., Mosayebi-Samani M., Kuo M.-F., Nitsche M. A. (2020). Induction of long-term potentiation-like plasticity in the primary motor cortex with repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation – Better effects with intensified protocols? Brain Stimul. 13, 987–997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahn S., Mellin J. M., Alagapan S., Alexander M. L., Gilmore J. H., Jarskog L. F., et al. . (2019). Targeting reduced neural oscillations in patients with schizophrenia by transcranial alternating current stimulation. NeuroImage 186, 126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.056 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aktürk T., de Graaf T. A., Güntekin B., Hanoğlu L., Sack A. T. (2022). Enhancing memory capacity by experimentally slowing theta frequency oscillations using combined EEG-tACS. Sci Rep 12:14199. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18665-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources