Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 11:6:100166.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100166. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Impact of donor organ quality on recipient outcomes in lung transplantation: 14-Year single-center experience using the Eurotransplant lung donor score

Affiliations

Impact of donor organ quality on recipient outcomes in lung transplantation: 14-Year single-center experience using the Eurotransplant lung donor score

Katharina Flöthmann et al. JHLT Open. .

Abstract

Background: The use of extended-criteria donor (ECD) organs has increased in lung transplantation, but their impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective single-center study evaluates the impact of donor quality, as defined by the Eurotransplant (ET) lung donor score, on long-term graft function and survival.

Methods: Records of recipients transplanted between January 2010 and May 2023 were reviewed. Eurotransplant lung donor scores (ET scores) were retrospectively calculated from the corresponding donor reports. Outcomes were compared between recipients of donor lungs with an ET score of 6 (group 1), 7 and 8 (group 2), and 9 to 13 (group 3, ECD lungs). Median follow-up was 64 (30-104) months.

Results: In total, 280 (19%) patients were transplanted with ET score 6 lungs, 717 (48%) patients with ET scores 7 and 8 lungs, and 506 (34%) patients with ET scores 9 to 13 (ECD) lungs. The occurrence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (p = 0.672), duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.062), and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.713) did not differ between groups. Long-term graft survival (%) was lower in group 2 and 3 vs group 1 recipients (at 10 years: 51 and 48 vs 56, p = 0.052, respectively). Similarly, freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD, %) was lower in group 2 and 3 vs group 1 recipients (at 10 years: 57 and 55 vs 63, p = 0.033, respectively). Donor smoking history was associated with worse CLAD-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.466, 95% confidence interval = 1.215-1.769, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: ECD lungs represented an important resource in lung transplantation. However, their use may be associated with a worse long-term graft and CLAD-free survival.

Keywords: Eurotransplant score; donor quality; extended-criteria lung donor; lung transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Fabio Ius declares a consulting contract with Biotest AG and congress travel grants paid by Abbott, outside the submitted work. Sophie Kruszona, Khalil Aburahma, Philipp Wand declare congress travel grants paid by Biotest AG, Xvivo, and Abbott, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors do not declare any conflict of interest. Acknowledgements and Funding: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The competing-risk factor analysis for CLAD. The orange represents the patient fraction who died without having experienced CLAD. The height of the yellow stripe shows the fraction of patients who have experienced the named event, and the light blue shows the percentage of patients without the event at the time indicated at the x axis. CLAD, chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

References

    1. Noda K., Furukawa M., Chan E.G., Sanchez P.G. Expanding donor options for lung transplant: extended criteria, donation after circulatory death, ABO incompatibility, and evolution of ex vivo lung perfusion. Transplantation. 2023;107:1440–1451. - PubMed
    1. Levvey B.J., Snell G.I. How do we expand the lung donor pool? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2024;30:398–404. - PubMed
    1. Oto T., Levvey B.J., Whitford H., et al. Feasibility and utility of a lung donor score: correlation with early post-transplant outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:257–263. - PubMed
    1. Smits J.M., Gottlieb J., Verschuuren E., et al. Impact of donor lung quality on post-transplant recipient outcome in the Lung Allocation Score era in Eurotransplant - a historical prospective study. Transpl Int. 2020;33:544–554. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loor G., Radosevich D.M., Kelly R.F., et al. The University of Minnesota donor lung quality index: a consensus-based scoring application improves donor lung use. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1156–1165. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources