Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;26(2):219-232.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.20763.

Cardiac Computed Tomography Measurements in Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Clinical Deterioration

Anthony J Weekes  1 , Angela M Pikus  1 , Parker L Hambright  1 , Kelly L Goonan  1 , Nathaniel O'Connell  2
Affiliations

Cardiac Computed Tomography Measurements in Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Clinical Deterioration

Anthony J Weekes et al. West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Most pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT) use a radiologist-determined right ventricle to left ventricle ratio (RV:LV) cut-off of 1.0 to risk-stratify pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. Continuous measurements from computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) may improve risk stratification. We assessed associations of CTPA cardiac measurements with acute clinical deterioration and use of advanced PE interventions.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of a PE registry used by eight affiliated emergency departments. We used an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to measure RV:LV on anonymized CTPAs from registry patients for whom the PERT was activated (2018-2023) by institutional guidelines. Primary outcome was in-hospital PE-related clinical deterioration defined as cardiac arrest, vasoactive medication use for hypotension, or rescue respiratory interventions. Secondary outcome was advanced intervention use. We used bivariable and multivariable analyses. For the latter, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest (RF) to determine associations of all candidate variables with the primary outcome (clinical deterioration), and the Youden index to determine RV:LV optimal cut-offs for primary outcome.

Results: Artificial intelligence analyzed 1,467 CTPAs, with 88% agreement on RV:LV categorization with radiologist reports (kappa 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.43). Of 1,639 patients, 190 (11.6%) had PE-related clinical deterioration, and 314 (19.2%) had advanced interventions. Mean RV:LV were 1.50 (0.39) vs 1.30 (0.32) for those with and without clinical deterioration and 1.62 (0.33) vs 1.35 (0.32) for those with and without advanced intervention use. The RV:LV cut-off of 1.0 by AI and radiologists had 0.02 and 0.53 P-values for clinical deterioration, respectively. With adjusted LASSO, top clinical deterioration predictors were cardiac arrest at presentation, lowest systolic blood pressure, and intensive care unit admission. The RV:LV measurement was a top 10 predictor of clinical deterioration by RF. Optimal cut-off for RV:LV was 1.54 with odds ratio of 2.50 (1.85, 3.45) and area under the curve 0.6 (0.66, 0.70).

Conclusion: Artifical intelligence-derived RV:LV measurements ≥1.5 on initial CTPA had strong associations with in-hospital clinical deterioration and advanced interventions in a large PERT database. This study points to the potential of capitalizing on immediately available CTPA RV:LV measurements for gauging PE severity and risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram*. AI, artifical intelligence; PE, pulmonary embolism; CTPA, computed tomography pulmonary angiography, RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Random forest variable importance plot for predicting clinical deterioration. CTPA, computed tomography pulmonary angiography; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; ICU, intensive care unit.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. . 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543–603. - PubMed
    1. Meinel FG, Nance JW, Jr., Schoepf UJ, et al. . Predictive value of computed tomography in acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2015;128(7):747–59.e2. - PubMed
    1. Coutance G, Cauderlier E, Ehtisham J, et al. . The prognostic value of markers of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade I, Mehdipoor G, Le Mao R, et al. . Prognostic significance of computed tomography-assessed right ventricular enlargement in low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2021;197:48–55. - PubMed
    1. Raper JD, Thomas AM, Lupez K, et al. . Can right ventricular assessments improve triaging of low risk pulmonary embolism? Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(7):835–50. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources