Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 27;19(1):129.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02287-4.

Concurrent robotic colorectal surgical oncology training within a structured mentored international fellowship program

Affiliations

Concurrent robotic colorectal surgical oncology training within a structured mentored international fellowship program

Trevor M Yeung et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

Robotic colorectal surgery is increasingly adopted worldwide, with mentored programs for established surgeons becoming more common. However, there is a paucity of dedicated robotic training programs for colorectal fellows. This study aims to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a structured, apprentice-based robotic colorectal training program delivered to multiple fellows concurrently. The fellowship program incorporates simulation training, dry/wet laboratory work, dedicated robotic console time in the operating room (OR) and individualised mentorship. Overall robotic proficiency was assessed using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and procedure-specific proficiency was assessed using a modified European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery (EARCS) Global Assessment Score (GAS) throughout the fellowship. A total of 59 cases (29 right hemicolectomies, 30 anterior resections) were evaluated between August 2023 and July 2024. Significant improvements were observed in GEARS scores (p = 0.0065) and modified GAS for both right hemicolectomies (p = 0.0052) and anterior resections (p = 0.0005), demonstrating a high level of competence and independence. Mean operative times were 213 min (right hemicolectomy) and 328 min (anterior resection). Median length of stay in the hospital was 2 days (right hemicolectomy) and 4 days (anterior resection). Median lymph node yield was 29 (right hemicolectomy) and 26 (anterior resection). There was 0% involved margins for both procedures. Robotic colorectal surgical oncology training delivered to multiple fellows concurrently in an apprenticeship model with dedicated console time is achievable and successful, leading to high levels of robotic competency and independence, whilst maintaining a high standard of clinical care and oncological outcome.

Keywords: Fellowship; Robotic colorectal surgery; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical statement: This is an observational study. Ethical approval was waivered by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) institutional board.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). Each fellow was asked to self-assess their robotic skills at the beginning and at the end of the fellowship in six domains: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, autonomy and robotic control. Proficiency in each domain was scored on a 5-point Likert Scale, with an overall performance score ranging from 6 to 30. Scores from first month were compared with the scores from the last month. Paired t-test, p = 0.0065
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modified Global Assessment Score (GAS) for Robotic Right Hemicolectomies. Every two months, each fellow assessed their proficiency in performing a robotic right hemicolectomy. The maximum score is 24 and a score of 20 or above represents independent and competent performance. Scores from the first two-month period were compared with the final two-month period. Paired t-test, p = 0.0052
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Modified Global Assessment Score (GAS) for Robotic anterior resections. Every two months, each fellow assessed their proficiency in performing a robotic anterior resection. The maximum score is 54 and a score of 45 or above represents independent and competent performance. Scores from the first two-month period were compared with the final two-month period. Paired t-test, p = 0.0005

References

    1. Feng Q, Yuan W, Li T, Tang B, Jia B, Zhou Y et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(11):991–1004 - PubMed
    1. Park JS, Lee SM, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Song SH et al (2023) Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: The COLRAR Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 278(1):31–38 - PubMed
    1. Siddiqi N, Stefan S, Jootun R, Mykoniatis I, Flashman K, Beable R et al (2021) Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience. Surg Endosc 35(12):6873–6881 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harji D, Houston F, Burke J, Griffiths B, Tilney H, Miskovic D et al (2023) The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes. J Robot Surg 17(2):251–263 - PubMed
    1. Panteleimonitis S, Miskovic D, Bissett-Amess R, Figueiredo N, Turina M, Spinoglio G et al (2021) Short-term clinical outcomes of a European training programme for robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 35(12):6796–6806 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources