What can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work participation among people with work disabilities? A qualitative practice & policy perspective approach
- PMID: 40148811
- PMCID: PMC11951741
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22300-7
What can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work participation among people with work disabilities? A qualitative practice & policy perspective approach
Abstract
Background: Previous studies among people with work disabilities (WD) showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic they were at risk for negative outcomes on work participation and health. These studies focused on people's own accounts of their difficulties to work and did not include the policy and practice perspective. The aim of the present study was to explore the policy and practice perspective on what can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD, in times of crisis and beyond.
Methods: We used a multi-stakeholder perspective qualitative approach. Between March 2021 and September 2022, twenty-five semi-structured in-depth online interviews were conducted with occupational health professionals (13), employers (7) and policymakers (5). Participants were asked to share their experiences about employees or job seekers with work disabilities on (re)gaining and maintaining paid employment, barriers and facilitators for work participation during the Covid-19 crisis and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD in times of crisis and beyond. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
Results: The results indicated that, although employers rapidly implemented new working arrangements, people with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis, especially those with temporary contracts. Job loss and detrimental effects on mental health were identified. Other barriers to work participation included hampered collaboration between stakeholders during lockdowns and fewer job opportunities due to workplace shutdowns. Nevertheless, employers and occupational health professionals noticed that some employees were surprisingly flexible and capable with regard to performing alternative work tasks. We also identified ways to improve work participation for people with WD, including simplifying legislation and establishing sustainable policies on employment, investing in career development, creating an inclusive organizational culture and increasing accessibility to information and support assistance.
Conclusions: People with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis. The introduction of new working arrangements became widespread during the COVID-19 crisis, which had both positive and negative consequences for people with WD. Our results showed that improving work participation for people with WD requires a multifaceted approach, which can be achieved by the practical and policy recommendations offered by this study.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Disability; Employment; Needs; Occupational health services; Qualitative study.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This research was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Amsterdam UMC. Informational letters were sent to all participants which gave them the opportunity to consider their participation and allowed them to give informed consent. Interview participants gave their audio-recorded informed consent prior to interviews. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: MV and AB have no conflict of interest. The chair of JRA is supported by the SSI. MZ is employed at SSI. MH and TJ are partially paid by SSI. SSI had no role in the design and completion of the study.
Similar articles
-
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 39949202
-
Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: a mixed methods study.BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15720-w. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37237345 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to sexual and reproductive health services for women and gender-diverse people with disabilities in Canada: a qualitative study.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2441027. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2441027. Epub 2025 Jan 13. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024. PMID: 39668741 Free PMC article.
-
Workplace accommodations during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review of the impacts and implications for people with disabilities.Work. 2023;74(2):381-406. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220129. Work. 2023. PMID: 36314186
References
-
- van der Noordt M, et al. Health effects of employment: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(10):730–6. - PubMed
-
- United Nations. The UN convention on the rights of personswith disabilities. 2006.
-
- United Nations. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2015.
-
- Oude Geerdink E, Huysmans MA, van Kempen H, van Weeghel J, Motazedi E, Anema JR. Individual Placement and Support and Participatory Workplace Intervention on the Work Participation of People with Disabilities: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2024. 10.1007/s10926-024-10219-6. - PubMed
-
- Benach J, et al. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229–53. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical