Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):363.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07434-1.

Validation of the intolerance of uncertainty scale-12 in a sample of pregnant people

Kayla Costello  1 , C Alix Timko  2 , Drew Anderson  1 , Julia M Hormes  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Validation of the intolerance of uncertainty scale-12 in a sample of pregnant people

Kayla Costello et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has been proposed as a transdiagnostic mechanism driving anxiety, depression, and eating disorder symptoms. Pregnancy is a time of significant uncertainty, yet few studies have examined the measurement of IU and its impacts on pregnant people. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of two versions of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-27 and IUS-12) and their associations with psychopathologies common in pregnancy.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of participants (n = 254) recruited for a larger study of a single-session intervention targeting disordered eating in pregnancy. We examined fit of participant baseline data with IUS-27 and IUS-12 factor structures using confirmatory factor analyses. We also assessed associations between IU and emotion dysregulation and depression and eating disorder symptoms, controlling for age, parity, and perceived social status.

Results: The IUS-12 provided superior fit to the data (CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.09) compared to the IUS-27. The IUS-12 was significantly (all p < 0.05) correlated with measures of emotion dysregulation (r = 0.67), depression (r = 0.58), and eating disorders (r = 0.37). Inhibitory IU rather than prospective IU was generally significantly associated with greater psychopathology (ß range = 0.46 - 3.51, p's < 0.01).

Conclusions: Results from this study provide initial support for the IUS-12 as a valid measure of IU in pregnant people and suggest that IU is strongly associated with measures of depression, emotion dysregulation, and eating disorder behaviors in this population. Severe psychological distress in pregnancy has been linked to complications in gestation and delivery and overall poor birth outcomes. Clinicians and doctors should consider using the IUS-12 as a general measure of psychological distress among pregnant patients.

Trial registration: The trial from which these data were drawn is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06129461 (registered on November 10, 2023).

Keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis; Factor structure; Intolerance of uncertainty; Intolerance of uncertainty scale; Pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University at Albany, State University of New York in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The Institutional Review Board granted a waiver of signed informed; all participants reviewed an informed consent form and indicated their consent to participate in the research by completing the study questionnaires. Consent for publication: All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Standardized fit coefficients for confirmatory factor analyses. Note. Figure A depicts confirmatory factor analyses for the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-27; “fac1” = “Uncertainty has negative behavioral and self-referent implications”; “fac2” = “Uncertainty is unfair and spoils everything”; IUS = Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Figure B depicts confirmatory factor analyses for the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12; “fac1” = “Prospective Intolerance of Uncertainty”; “fac2” = “Inhibitory Intolerance of Uncertainty”
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abramowitz, J. S., Taylor, S., & McKay, D. (2009). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Lancet. 374(9688), 491–499. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60240-3 - PubMed
    1. Abrams, L. R., & Mehta, N. K. (2019). Changes in depressive symptoms over age among older Americans: Differences by gender, race/ethnicity, education, and birth cohort. SSM - Population Health, 7(100399). 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100399 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):586–92. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basevitz P, Pushkar D, Chaikelson J, Conway M, Dalton C. Age-related differences in worry and related processes. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2008;66(4):283–305. 10.2190/AG.66.4.b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birrell, J., Meares, K., Wilkinson, A., & Freeston, M. H. (2011). Toward a definition of intolerance of uncertainty: A review of factor analytical studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Clin Psych Rev. 31(7), 1198–1208. 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data