Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 1;14(3):254.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030254.

Recent Advances in Biofilm Control Technologies for the Food Industry

Affiliations
Review

Recent Advances in Biofilm Control Technologies for the Food Industry

Jirapat Dawan et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Biofilms remain a major challenge in the food industry due to the increased resistance of foodborne pathogens to antimicrobial agents and food processing stresses, leading to food contamination and significant health risks. Their resistance to preservation techniques, antimicrobial treatments, and processing conditions increases concerns regarding food safety. This review discusses recent developments in physical, chemical, and surface modification strategies to control and remove biofilms in food processing environments. Physical methods, such as thermal treatments, electric fields, and ultrasonic systems, have demonstrated their efficacy in disrupting biofilm structure and improving disinfection processes. Chemical treatments, including the use of sanitizers, disinfectants, acidulants, and enzymes, provide targeted approaches to degrade biofilm matrices and inhibit bacterial adhesion. Furthermore, surface modifications of food contact materials provide innovative solutions for preventing biofilm formation and enhancing food safety. These cutting-edge strategies not only improve food safety but also reduce contamination risk in food processing facilities. The review highlights the mechanisms, efficacy, and applicability of these techniques, emphasizing their potential to mitigate biofilm-associated risks and ensure food quality and safety.

Keywords: anti-biofilm; antibiotic; antimicrobial; bacteriophage; probiotic; surface modification; thermal processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thermal treatment and bioelectric effects for biofilm removal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasonic systems for the removal of biofilms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reactive oxygen species produced by surface modification agents inhibit biofilm formation in bacteria.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Chemical treatments disrupting quorum sensing systems and biofilm EPS.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Biological treatments for biofilm control and removal: (A) bacteriophages and natural compounds and (B) probiotics.

References

    1. Liu J., Chen D., Peters B.M., Li L., Li B., Xu Z., Shirliff M.E. Staphylococcal chromosomal cassettes mec (SCCmec): A mobile genetic element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathogen. 2016;101:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.10.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Redmond E.C., Griffith C.J. Consumer food handling in the home: A review of food safety studies. J. Food Prot. 2003;66:130–161. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.1.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang S.C., Lin C.H., Aljuffali I.A., Fang J.Y. Current pathogenic Escherichia coli foodborne outbreak cases and therapy development. Arch. Microbiol. 2017;199:811–825. doi: 10.1007/s00203-017-1393-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nahar S., Mizan M.F.R., Ha A.J., Ha S.D. Advances and future prospects of enzyme-based biofilm prevention approaches in the food industry. Comprehen. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018;17:1484–1502. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12382. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiong Y., Chen M., Warner R.D., Fang Z. Incorporating nisin and grape seed extract in chitosan-gelatine edible coating and its effect on cold storage of fresh pork. Food Cont. 2020;110:107018. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107018. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources