Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 24;16(3):265.
doi: 10.3390/genes16030265.

Oncological Treatment Adverse Reaction Prediction: Development and Initial Validation of a Pharmacogenetic Model in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Affiliations

Oncological Treatment Adverse Reaction Prediction: Development and Initial Validation of a Pharmacogenetic Model in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Concetta Cafiero et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The accurate prediction of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to oncological treatments still poses a clinical challenge. Chemotherapy is usually selected based on clinical trials that do not consider patient variability in ADR risk. Consequently, many patients undergo multiple treatments to find the appropriate medication or dosage, enhancing ADR risks and increasing the chance of discontinuing therapy. We first aimed to develop a pharmacogenetic model for predicting chemotherapy-induced ADRs in cancer patients (the ANTIBLASTIC DRUG MULTIPANEL PLATFORM) and then to assess its feasibility and validate this model in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing oncological treatments. Methods: Seventy NSCLC patients of all stages that needed oncological treatment at our facility were enrolled, reflecting the typical population served by our institution, based on geographic and demographic characteristics. Treatments followed existing guidelines, and patients were continuously monitored for adverse reactions. We developed and used a multipanel platform based on 326 SNPs that we identified as strongly associated with response to cancer treatments. Subsequently, a network-based algorithm to link these SNPs to molecular and biological functions, as well as efficacy and adverse reactions to oncological treatments, was used. Results: Data and blood samples were collected from 70 NSCLC patients. A bioinformatic analysis of all identified SNPs highlighted five clusters of patients based on variant aggregations and the associated genes, suggesting potential susceptibility to treatment-related toxicity. We assessed the feasibility of the platform and technically validated it by comparing NSCLC patients undergoing the same course of treatment with or without ADRs against the cluster combination. An odds ratio analysis confirmed the correlation between cluster allocation and increased ADR risk, indicating specific treatment susceptibilities. Conclusions: The ANTIBLASTIC DRUG MULTIPANEL PLATFORM was easily applicable and able to predict ADRs in NSCLC patients undergoing oncological treatments. The application of this novel predictive model could significantly reduce adverse drug reactions and improve the rate of chemotherapy completion, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. Its potential for broader prescription management suggests significant treatment improvements in cancer patients.

Keywords: cancer; individual variability; oncology; personalized medicine; pharmacogenetics; pharmacogenomics; supportive care; symptom management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the pipeline of the protocol used for the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Specifics of identified clusters. (A) Distribution of various genes related to the specific variants for each cluster. (B) Number of patients, genes, and variants identified in each cluster.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of drugs in the 5 clusters identified based on variants observed. The fraction of each drug is associated with each cluster with respect to the total presence in the dataset.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphical representation of odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. The association between clusters and therapy is shown.

References

    1. Donnelly J.G. Pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy: Balancing toxicity and response. Ther. Drug Monit. 2004;26:231–235. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200404000-00026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caudle K.E., Klein T.E., Hoffman J.M., Muller D.J., Whirl-Carrillo M., Gong L., McDonagh E.M., Sangkuhl K., Thorn C.F., Schwab M., et al. Incorporation of pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice: The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline development process. Curr. Drug Metab. 2014;15:209–217. doi: 10.2174/1389200215666140130124910. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du R., Wang X., Ma L., Larcher L.M., Tang H., Zhou H., Chen C., Wang T. Adverse reactions of targeted therapy in cancer patients: A retrospective study of hospital medical data in China. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07946-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch T.M., Meijerman I., Beijnen J.H., Schellens J.H. Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:253–285. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200645030-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhatt M., Peshkin B.N., Kazi S., Schwartz M.D., Ashai N., Swain S.M., Smith D.M. Pharmacogenomic testing in oncology: A health system’s approach to identify oncology provider perspectives. Pharmacogenomics. 2023;24:859–870. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0164. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources