Sex differences on tau, astrocytic, and neurodegenerative plasma biomarkers
- PMID: 40151917
- PMCID: PMC12450407
- DOI: 10.1177/13872877251329468
Sex differences on tau, astrocytic, and neurodegenerative plasma biomarkers
Abstract
BackgroundSex differences have consistently been identified on autopsy, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid outcomes related to Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the exact mechanisms for these associations are unclear. Blood-based biomarkers are practical alternatives for the investigation of mechanisms of AD, in addition to accurate disease detection and monitoring.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine sex differences across a panel of blood-based plasma biomarkers in participants with and without cognitive impairment due to AD.MethodsPlasma samples were collected from 567 participants from across the AD diagnostic continuum (i.e., normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia) and analyzed for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL), phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), and total tau (t-tau). Baseline and longitudinal analyses evaluated for any significant associations between sex and AD-related plasma biomarkers.ResultsFemales were found to have higher plasma GFAP compared to males at baseline regardless of cognitive diagnosis. Among those with AD dementia, females were also found to have higher NfL levels compared to males. Longitudinal analyses found that higher plasma NfL at baseline was associated with an increased risk of worsening AD dementia status only in females. No significant findings were observed for p-tau181 or t-tau.ConclusionsThis study found significant sex differences in plasma biomarkers of GFAP and NfL. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms mediating these differences.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; blood-based plasma biomarkers; female; glial fibrillary acidic protein; neurofilament light; p-tau181; sex; t-tau.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MLA receives research support from Life Molecular Imaging Inc and Rainwater Charitable Foundation Inc. He has also received a single time honorarium from the Michael J Fox Foundation for services unrelated to this study. He received royalties from Oxford University Press Inc. AEB receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Vox Neuro. He receives consulting monies from Eli Lilly and AbbVie. He receives royalties from Elsevier and Oxford University Press. HZ has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZPath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Roche, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program. KB has served as a consultant and at advisory boards for Abbvie, AC Immune, ALZPath, AriBio, BioArctic, Biogen, Eisai, Lilly, Moleac Pte. Ltd, Neurimmune, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers; has served at data monitoring committees for Julius Clinical and Novartis; has given lectures, produced educational materials and participated in educational programs for AC Immune, Biogen, Celdara Medical, Eisai and Roche Diagnostics; and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the work presented in this paper. KT receives industry funding from Vox Neuro. RA serves as a scientific advisor to Signant Health and NovoNordisk and as a consultant to the Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative. None of this research, consulting, or royalties are related to this study. Henrik Zetterberg, Rhoda Au, and Michael L Alosco are Editorial Board Members of this journal but were not involved in the peer-review process of this article nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.
Figures


References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous