Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun;131(8):1651-1660.
doi: 10.1002/jso.28108. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes

Francesco Di Bello et al. J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify improvements in adverse in-hospital outcomes between historical and contemporary robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus historical and contemporary open RC (ORC).

Material and methods: Within the National Inpatient Sample (2010-2019), RARC and ORC ileal conduit diversion patients were identified. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models were fitted.

Results: Of RARC patients, 1343 (39%) were historical (2010-2014) and 2087 (61%) were contemporary (2015-2019). Of ORC patients, 5812 (54%) were historical and 5019 (46%) were contemporary. Versus historical counterparts, contemporary RARC patients exhibited significantly better adverse in-hospital outcomes in 9 of 13 categories, with improvements ranging from -82% for intraoperative complications to -22% for cumulative postoperative complications. Similarly, versus historical, contemporary ORC patients also exhibited significantly better adverse in-hospital outcomes in 9 of 13 categories, with improvements ranging from -72% for intraoperative complications to -12% for median length of stay (LOS). When contemporary RARC was compared to contemporary ORC, RARC adverse in-hospital outcomes were better in 7 of 13 comparisons, with improvements ranging from -55% for blood transfusions to -18% for median LOS. Similarly, when historical RARC was compared to historical ORC, RARC adverse in-hospital outcomes were better in 6 of 13 comparisons, with improvements ranging from -55% for blood transfusions to -15% for median LOS.

Conclusion: The magnitude of the improvement in adverse in-hospital outcomes was comparable between contemporary versus historical RARC (nine improved categories) and contemporary versus historical ORC (nine improved categories). However, contemporary RARC outperformed contemporary ORC in 7 of 13 categories of adverse in-hospital outcomes.

Keywords: NIS; bladder cancer; complications; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. T. W. Flaig, P. E. Spiess, M. Abern, et al., “NCCN Guidelines Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2022,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 20, no. 8 (2022): 866–878, https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0041.
    1. EAU Guidelines on MIBC–DISEASE MANAGEMENT–Uroweb, Uroweb ‐ European Association of Urology. (2024), https://uroweb.org/guidelines/muscle-invasive-and-metastatic-bladder-can....
    1. B. H. Bochner, G. Dalbagni, K. H. Marzouk, et al., “Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot‐Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes,” European Urology 74, no. 4 (2018): 465–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030.
    1. D. J. Parekh, I. M. Reis, E. P. Castle, et al., “Robot‐Assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer (Razor): An Open‐Label, Randomised, Phase 3, Non‐Inferiority Trial,” Lancet 391, no. 10139 (2018): 2525–2536, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6.
    1. V. Venkatramani, I. M. Reis, E. P. Castle, et al., “Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression‐Free and Overall Survival Following Open Versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis From the RAZOR Trial With a 3‐Year Followup,” Journal of Urology 203, no. 3 (2020): 522–529, https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000565.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources