Acceptability of a Web-Based Health App (PortfolioDiet.app) to Translate a Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Adults: Mixed Methods Randomized Ancillary Pilot Study
- PMID: 40152922
- PMCID: PMC11992491
- DOI: 10.2196/58124
Acceptability of a Web-Based Health App (PortfolioDiet.app) to Translate a Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Adults: Mixed Methods Randomized Ancillary Pilot Study
Abstract
Background: The Portfolio Diet is a dietary pattern for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction with 5 key categories including nuts and seeds; plant protein from specific food sources; viscous fiber sources; plant sterols; and plant-derived monounsaturated fatty acid sources. To enhance implementation of the Portfolio Diet, we developed the PortfolioDiet.app, an automated, web-based, multicomponent, patient-facing health app that was developed with psychological theory.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PortfolioDiet.app on dietary adherence and its acceptability among adults with a high risk of CVD over 12 weeks.
Methods: Potential participants with evidence of atherosclerosis and a minimum of one additional CVD risk factor in an ongoing trial were invited to participate in a remote web-based ancillary study by email. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a concealed computer-generated allocation sequence to the PortfolioDiet.app group or a control group for 12 weeks. Adherence to the Portfolio Diet was assessed by weighed 7-day diet records at baseline and 12 weeks using the clinical Portfolio Diet Score, ranging from 0 to 25. Acceptability of the app was evaluated using a multifaceted approach, including usability through the System Usability Scale ranging from 0 to 100, with a score >70 being considered acceptable, and a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions using NVivo 12.
Results: In total, 41 participants were invited from the main trial to join the ancillary study by email, of which 15 agreed, and 14 were randomized (8 in the intervention group and 6 in the control group) and completed the ancillary study. At baseline, adherence to the Portfolio Diet was high in both groups with a mean clinical Portfolio Diet Score of 13.2 (SD 3.7; 13.2/25, 53%) and 13.7 (SD 5.8; 13.7/25, 55%) in the app and control groups, respectively. After the 12 weeks, there was a tendency for a mean increase in adherence to the Portfolio Diet by 1.25 (SD 2.8; 1.25/25, 5%) and 0.19 (SD 4.4; 0.19/25, 0.8%) points in the app and control group, respectively, with no difference between groups (P=.62). Participants used the app on average for 18 (SD 14) days per month and rated the app as usable (System Usability Scale of mean 80.9, SD 17.3). Qualitative analyses identified 4 main themes (user engagement, usability, external factors, and added components), which complemented the quantitative data obtained.
Conclusions: Although adherence was higher for the PortfolioDiet.app group, no difference in adherence was found between the groups in this small ancillary study. However, this study demonstrates that the PortfolioDiet.app is considered usable by high-risk adults and may reinforce dietitian advice to follow the Portfolio Diet when it is a part of a trial for CVD management.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02481466; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02481466.
Keywords: Portfolio Diet; acceptability; apps; cardiovascular disease; cholesterol reduction; diet; dietary app; dietary portfolio; eHealth; usability.
©Meaghan E Kavanagh, Laura Chiavaroli, Selina M Quibrantar, Gabrielle Viscardi, Kimberly Ramboanga, Natalie Amlin, Melanie Paquette, Sandhya Sahye-Pudaruth, Darshna Patel, Shannan M Grant, Andrea J Glenn, Sabrina Ayoub-Charette, Andreea Zurbau, Robert G Josse, Vasanti S Malik, Cyril W C Kendall, David J A Jenkins, John L Sievenpiper. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 28.03.2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: MEK was a part-time employee at INQUIS Clinical Research, Ltd, a contract research organization. LC has received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Protein Industries Canada (a government of Canada Global Innovation Clusters), Alberta Pulse Growers, and the United Soybean Board (USDA soy Checkoff program). AJG has received travel support and/or honoraria from Vinasoy, the Soy Nutrition Institute Global, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. SA-C has received an honorarium from the International Food Information Council for a talk on artificial sweeteners, the gut microbiome, and the risk for diabetes. AZ is a part-time research associate at INQUIS Clinical Research, Ltd, a contract research organization. She has received consulting fees from the Glycemic Index Foundation. CWCK, DJAJ, and JLS have received funding support, honoraria, consulting, or travel fees from a broad range of food, beverage, and ingredient companies, trade associations, government agencies, health charities, private foundations, or other commercial or nonprofit entities with an interest in nutrition and chronic disease prevention and management. For a complete list of disclosures, see Multimedia Appendix 6. All other authors declare no other conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, Barengo NC, Beaton AZ, Benjamin EJ, Benziger CP, Bonny A, Brauer M, Brodmann M, Cahill TJ, Carapetis J, Catapano AL, Chugh SS, Cooper LT, Coresh J, Criqui M, DeCleene N, Eagle KA, Emmons-Bell S, Feigin VL, Fernández-Solà J, Fowkes G, Gakidou E, Grundy SM, He FJ, Howard G, Hu F, Inker L, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Koroshetz W, Lavie C, Lloyd-Jones D, Lu HS, Mirijello A, Temesgen AM, Mokdad A, Moran AE, Muntner P, Narula J, Neal B, Ntsekhe M, Moraes de Oliveira G, Otto C, Owolabi M, Pratt M, Rajagopalan S, Reitsma M, Ribeiro AL, Rigotti N, Rodgers A, Sable C, Shakil S, Sliwa-Hahnle K, Stark B, Sundström J, Timpel P, Tleyjeh IM, Valgimigli M, Vos T, Whelton PK, Yacoub M, Zuhlke L, Murray C, Fuster V, GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/809754 S0735-1097(20)37775-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sud M, Han L, Koh M, Abdel-Qadir H, Austin PC, Farkouh ME, Godoy LC, Lawler PR, Udell JA, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 22;76(12):1440–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.033. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735-1097(20)36032-0 S0735-1097(20)36032-0 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sarak B, Savu A, Kaul P, McAlister FA, Welsh RC, Yan AT, Goodman SG. Lipid testing, lipid-modifying therapy, and PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin-Kexin Type 9) inhibitor eligibility in 27 979 patients with incident acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Apr;14(4):e006646. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006646. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, Ray KK, Packard CJ, Bruckert E, Hegele RA, Krauss RM, Raal FJ, Schunkert H, Watts GF, Borén J, Fazio S, Horton JD, Masana L, Nicholls SJ, Nordestgaard BG, van de Sluis B, Taskinen M, Tokgözoglu L, Landmesser U, Laufs U, Wiklund O, Stock JK, Chapman MJ, Catapano AL. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017 Aug 21;38(32):2459–72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/548996 3745109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Desai NR, Farbaniec M, Karalis DG. Nonadherence to lipid-lowering therapy and strategies to improve adherence in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jan;46(1):13–21. doi: 10.1002/clc.23935. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/36267039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
