Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Apr 24;65(4):2402249.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02249-2024. Print 2025 Apr.

Pirfenidone in post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (FIBRO-COVID): a phase 2 randomised clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pirfenidone in post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (FIBRO-COVID): a phase 2 randomised clinical trial

Guadalupe Bermudo-Peloche et al. Eur Respir J. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe COVID-19 may develop lung fibrosis. Pirfenidone is an anti-fibrotic drug approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung changes after recovery from severe COVID-19 pneumonia were evaluated.

Methods: This was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Spanish multicentre clinical trial. Patients were randomised to receive pirfenidone or placebo (2:1) for 24 weeks. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients that improved, considered when percentage change in forced vital capacity (FVC) was ≥10% and/or any reduction in the fibrotic score on chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Secondary end-points included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exercise capacity and drug safety profile.

Results: From 119 eligible patients, 113 were randomised and 103 were analysed (pirfenidone n=69 and placebo n=34). Most patients were male (73.5%) and were receiving low-dose prednisone; mean age was 63.7 years and mean body mass index was 29 kg·m-2. The percentage of patients that improved was similar in the pirfenidone and placebo groups (79.7% versus 82.3%, respectively). The mean predicted FVC increased by 12.74±20.6% with pirfenidone and 4.35±22.3% with placebo (p=0.071), and the HRCT (%) fibrotic score decreased by 5.44±3.69% with pirfenidone and 2.57±2.59% with placebo (p=0.52). Clinically meaningful improvement in HRQoL was not statistically different (55.2% in the pirfenidone group and 39.4% in the placebo group). Exercise capacity, adverse events and hospitalisations were similar between groups. No deaths were reported.

Conclusions: The overall improvements in lung function and HRCT fibrotic score after 6 months with pirfenidone were not significantly different than with placebo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: M. Molina-Molina has received grants and fees for scientific advice from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Ferrer and Veracyte, outside the submitted work. D. Castillo reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Fujirebio, and personal fees from Veracyte, outside the submitted work. J. Rigual Bobillo has received grants and fees for scientific advice from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

None
Overview of the study.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient flowchart. From 119 subjects initially screened, six subjects were excluded: withdrawal of consent (n=3), abnormal biochemical blood analysis (n=2) and history of angioedema (n=1). Finally, 113 subjects were randomised. Patients discontinued the study prematurely due to the following reasons: toxicity in four patients (3.5%) in the pirfenidone group and in three patients (2.7%) in the placebo group, and consent withdrawal in three patients (3.5%) in the pirfenidone group. FVC: forced vital capacity; ITT: intention-to-treat; mITT: modified intention-to-treat.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean difference in forced vital capacity (FVC) between visits 1 and 3. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Comment in

References

    1. Torres Acosta MA, Singer BD. Pathogenesis of COVID-19-induced ARDS: implications for an ageing population. Eur Respir J 2020; 56: 2002049. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02049-2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guler SA, Ebner L, Aubry-Beigelman C, et al. Pulmonary function and radiological features 4 months after COVID-19: first results from the national prospective observational Swiss COVID-19 lung study. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2003690. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03690-2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. González J, de Batlle J, Benítez ID, et al. Key factors associated with pulmonary sequelae in the follow-up of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Arch Bronconeumol 2023; 59: 205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2022.12.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valenzuela C, Waterer G, Raghu G. Interstitial lung disease before and after COVID-19: a double threat? Eur Respir J 2021; 58: 2101956. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01956-2021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han X, Fan Y, Alwalid O, et al. Six-month follow-up chest CT findings after severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiology 2021; 299: E177–E186. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms