Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;13(4):e716-e731.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7.

Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice

Nina Gobat et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

In May 2022, member states of WHO adopted the World Health Assembly WHA75.8 resolution on strengthening clinical trials to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. The resolution recognises the central role of community stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem. This paper aims to take stock of the state of the field and define key actions from stakeholders across the clinical trial ecosystem for systematic engagement of patient, public, and community stakeholders in clinical trials. Upfront, sustained, inclusive, and meaningful engagement with patients, public, and community stakeholders intended to benefit from trial outcomes is crucial for several reasons. First, better engagement ensures that trials are well designed and well implemented by considering the unique perspectives and experiences of those they aim to benefit. Second, better engagement enhances the scientific, ethical, and pragmatic value of trials by improving the acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of trial design, implementation, and outcome dissemination. Lastly, improving engagement fosters trust in science and scientists, strengthens research literacy, and contributes to greater trust in research processes. This trust is particularly important in public health emergencies where the urgency for identifying effective interventions, including new vaccines and medicines, often results in limited engagement. In practice, engagement involves activities throughout the trial lifecycle, including research agenda setting, protocol development, trial conduct, and outcome dissemination. Key stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial roles in enabling and implementing engagement via participatory practices. Despite some key markers of progress, challenges remain, including systemic gaps, limited engagement beyond tokenistic involvement, and structural inequities. Addressing these challenges requires action across the clinical trial ecosystem, including strengthening policies, enhancing funding mechanisms, improving regulatory oversight, advocacy, and education of all stakeholders about engagement, and promoting a strong culture of engagement. Advancing the agenda for engagement can promote trust, ethical research conduct, and improve outcomes and wider uptake of findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests JS received grants from USAID Office of HIV/AIDS; honoraria and support for meetings from the University of Miami Center for AIDS Research and Weill Cornell Medicine; has a leadership role with the Good Clinical Trials Collaborative Advisory Council; and is a member of the SPIRAL Consortia Advisory Board. SH received grants from the USAID Office of HIV/AIDS. NS received support for meetings from WHO. CS received grants and support from USAID Office of HIV/AIDS (paid to institution); consulting fees from the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Wits University (Johannesburg, South Africa); honoraria from the National Institutes of Health; travel support from the Advanced Course of Vaccinology; and has served on data safety monitoring boards for Clover Biopharmaceuticals, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, MinervaX, and CAPRISA. All other authors declare no competing interests.

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources