Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice
- PMID: 40155109
- DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7
Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice
Abstract
In May 2022, member states of WHO adopted the World Health Assembly WHA75.8 resolution on strengthening clinical trials to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. The resolution recognises the central role of community stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem. This paper aims to take stock of the state of the field and define key actions from stakeholders across the clinical trial ecosystem for systematic engagement of patient, public, and community stakeholders in clinical trials. Upfront, sustained, inclusive, and meaningful engagement with patients, public, and community stakeholders intended to benefit from trial outcomes is crucial for several reasons. First, better engagement ensures that trials are well designed and well implemented by considering the unique perspectives and experiences of those they aim to benefit. Second, better engagement enhances the scientific, ethical, and pragmatic value of trials by improving the acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of trial design, implementation, and outcome dissemination. Lastly, improving engagement fosters trust in science and scientists, strengthens research literacy, and contributes to greater trust in research processes. This trust is particularly important in public health emergencies where the urgency for identifying effective interventions, including new vaccines and medicines, often results in limited engagement. In practice, engagement involves activities throughout the trial lifecycle, including research agenda setting, protocol development, trial conduct, and outcome dissemination. Key stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial roles in enabling and implementing engagement via participatory practices. Despite some key markers of progress, challenges remain, including systemic gaps, limited engagement beyond tokenistic involvement, and structural inequities. Addressing these challenges requires action across the clinical trial ecosystem, including strengthening policies, enhancing funding mechanisms, improving regulatory oversight, advocacy, and education of all stakeholders about engagement, and promoting a strong culture of engagement. Advancing the agenda for engagement can promote trust, ethical research conduct, and improve outcomes and wider uptake of findings.
Copyright © 2025 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests JS received grants from USAID Office of HIV/AIDS; honoraria and support for meetings from the University of Miami Center for AIDS Research and Weill Cornell Medicine; has a leadership role with the Good Clinical Trials Collaborative Advisory Council; and is a member of the SPIRAL Consortia Advisory Board. SH received grants from the USAID Office of HIV/AIDS. NS received support for meetings from WHO. CS received grants and support from USAID Office of HIV/AIDS (paid to institution); consulting fees from the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Wits University (Johannesburg, South Africa); honoraria from the National Institutes of Health; travel support from the Advanced Course of Vaccinology; and has served on data safety monitoring boards for Clover Biopharmaceuticals, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, MinervaX, and CAPRISA. All other authors declare no competing interests.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical