Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;135(7):2283-2290.
doi: 10.1002/lary.32157. Epub 2025 Mar 29.

Correlation of the VFSS Esophageal Screen to High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Affiliations

Correlation of the VFSS Esophageal Screen to High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Tyler W Crosby et al. Laryngoscope. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM).

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen.

Results: An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 (p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105).

Conclusions: The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders.

Keywords: dysmotility; dysphagia; esophageal screen; fluoroscopic swallow study; instrumental swallow study; manometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. S. Tagliaferri, F. Lauretani, G. Pelá, T. Meschi, and M. Maggio, “The Risk of Dysphagia Is Associated With Malnutrition and Poor Functional Outcomes in a Large Population of Outpatient Older Individuals,” Clinical Nutrition 38, no. 6 (2019): 2684–2689, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.11.022.
    1. L. P. Leow, M. L. Huckabee, T. Anderson, and L. Beckert, “The Impact of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Ageing and Parkinson's Disease as Measured by the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL‐QOL) Questionnaire,” Dysphagia 25, no. 3 (2010): 216–220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455‐009‐9245‐9.
    1. M. A. Knigge, S. Thibeault, and T. M. McCulloch, “Implementation of High‐Resolution Manometry in the Clinical Practice of Speech Language Pathology,” Dysphagia 29, no. 1 (2014): 2–16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455‐013‐9494‐5.
    1. D. A. Carlson, K. Ravi, P. J. Kahrilas, et al., “Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing,” American Journal of Gastroenterology 110, no. 7 (2015): 967–977, https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.159.
    1. G. C. do Carmo, J. Jafari, D. Sifrim, and R. B. de Oliveira, “Normal Esophageal Pressure Topography Metrics for Data Derived From the Sandhill‐Unisensor High‐Resolution Manometry Assembly in Supine and Sitting Positions,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility 27, no. 2 (2015): 285–292, https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12501.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources