Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jul;36(7):775-785.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.012. Epub 2025 Mar 27.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous pembrolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: the phase III 3475A-D77 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Subcutaneous versus intravenous pembrolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: the phase III 3475A-D77 trial

E Felip et al. Ann Oncol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab with berahyaluronidase alfa is for subcutaneous (s.c.) administration. The phase III open-label 3475A-D77 study (NCT05722015) assessed s.c. pembrolizumab versus intravenous (i.v.) pembrolizumab, plus chemotherapy, for treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

Patients and methods: Participants with newly diagnosed stage IV squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations were randomized 2 : 1 to pembrolizumab s.c. 790 mg every 6 weeks (q6w) or pembrolizumab i.v. 400 mg q6w (18 cycles), each given with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Dual primary endpoints were pharmacokinetic exposure measures of cycle 1 area under the curve (AUC0-6 weeks) and steady-state trough concentration (Ctrough) of pembrolizumab. The noninferiority margin for AUC0-6 weeks and Ctrough geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of pembrolizumab s.c. versus i.v. was specified as 0.8. Secondary endpoints included additional pharmacokinetic exposure measures, pembrolizumab immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety.

Results: In total 377 participants were randomized to the pembrolizumab s.c. (n = 251) or i.v. (n = 126) arms. The median time from randomization to data cut-off (12 July 2024) was 9.6 months (range 6.2-16.4 months). The median injection time for pembrolizumab s.c. was 2.0 min (range 1-12 min). The GMR [96% confidence interval (CI)] for cycle 1 AUC0-6 weeks was 1.14 (1.06-1.22); P < 0.0001. The GMR (94% CI) for steady-state Ctrough was 1.67 (1.52-1.84); P < 0.0001. Secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints were within established bounds for pembrolizumab. Anti-pembrolizumab antibodies were detected in 1.4% (pembrolizumab s.c. arm) and 0.9% (pembrolizumab i.v. arm) of participants. For the pembrolizumab s.c. versus i.v. arms, objective response rates (ORRs) were 45.4% versus 42.1% (ORR ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.85-1.37). Other efficacy measures were similar and safety profiles were consistent between treatment arms.

Conclusions: Overall exposure and trough concentrations of pembrolizumab s.c. 790 mg q6w were noninferior to those of pembrolizumab i.v. 400 mg q6w given with chemotherapy in participants with treatment-naive mNSCLC. Results support pembrolizumab s.c. as a treatment option in all indications where pembrolizumab i.v. can be used.

Keywords: immunotherapy; non-small-cell lung cancer; pembrolizumab; phase III; programmed cell death protein 1; subcutaneous.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources