Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 30;16(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01956-0.

Contrast-enhanced MRI-based intratumoral heterogeneity assessment for predicting lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

Contrast-enhanced MRI-based intratumoral heterogeneity assessment for predicting lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Junjian Shen et al. Insights Imaging. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a contrast-enhanced MRI-based intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) model for predicting lymph node (LN) metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods: Lesions were encoded into different habitats based on enhancement ratios at arterial, venous, and delayed phases of contrast-enhanced MRI. Habitat models on enhanced ratio mapping and single sequences, radiomic models, and clinical models were developed for evaluating LN metastasis. The performance of the models was evaluated via different metrics. Additionally, patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on an ensembled model to assess prognosis after adjuvant therapy.

Results: We developed an ensembled radiomics-habitat-clinical (RHC) model that integrates radiomics, habitat, and clinical data for precise prediction of LN metastasis in PDAC. The RHC model showed strong predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.805, 0.779, and 0.615 in the derivation, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Using an optimal threshold of 0.46, the model effectively stratified patients, revealing significant differences in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001). Adjuvant therapy improved OS in the high-risk group (p = 0.004), but no significant benefit was observed in the low-risk group (p = 0.069).

Conclusion: We developed an MRI-based ITH model that provides reliable estimates of LN metastasis for resectable PDAC and may offer additional value in guiding clinical decision-making.

Critical relevance statement: This ensemble RHC model facilitates preoperative prediction of LN metastasis in resectable PDAC using contrast-enhanced MRI. This offers a foundation for enhanced prognostic assessment and supports the management of personalized adjuvant treatment strategies.

Key points: MRI-based habitat models can predict LN metastasis in PDAC. Both the radiomics model and clinical characteristics were useful for predicting LN metastasis in PDAC. The RHC models have the potential to enhance predictive accuracy and inform personalized therapeutic decisions.

Keywords: Habitat; Lymph node metastasis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Hospital (approval no. B2024-250R). Due to its retrospective design, the requirement for obtaining written informed consent was waived. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: Z.C. is affiliated with Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of our study cohort
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The technical outline for this study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative MRI images of patients with LN-positive and LN-negative metastasis in Enhanced Ratio Mapping_arterial (Enhanced_A), Enhanced Ratio Mapping_venous (Enhanced_V), and Enhanced Ratio Mapping_delayed (Enhanced_D) sequences. Each color displays a distinct tumor habitat
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Confusion matrix of seven models in the deviation, internal validation, and external cohort
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Capacity of various models for predicting LN metastasis. a Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves of seven models in the deviation (ac), internal validation (df), and external validation (gi) cohorts
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves of recurrence-free (a) and OS (b) according to the final RHC model in the entire cohort (center 1). Additionally, KM survival curves of OS outcomes in patients at (c) high- and (d) low-risk groups for patients with or without adjuvant therapies (AC)

Similar articles

References

    1. Grossberg AJ, Chu LC, Deig CR et al (2020) Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 70:375–403 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bardeesy N, DePinho RA (2002) Pancreatic cancer biology and genetics. Nat Rev Cancer 2:897–909 - PubMed
    1. Perrotta G, Mohamed G, Larson BK et al (2024) Accuracy of clinical staging in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA 332:1108–1110 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu ZI, O Reilly EM (2024) Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:7–24 - PubMed
    1. Springfeld C, Ferrone CR, Katz MHG et al (2023) Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 20:318–337 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources