Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;51(3):e70027.
doi: 10.1002/ab.70027.

The Association of Cortisol and Testosterone Interaction With Inpatient Violence: Examining the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis in a Psychiatric Setting

Collaborators, Affiliations

The Association of Cortisol and Testosterone Interaction With Inpatient Violence: Examining the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis in a Psychiatric Setting

Yasmine Zerroug et al. Aggress Behav. 2025 May.

Abstract

Psychiatric inpatient aggression is a concern as it poses a threat to safety of both patients and staff. While psychosocial and behavioral approaches are often put forward, the role of biological factors remains underexplored in a clinical context such as psychiatric hospitals. The dual-hormone hypothesis (DHH) posits that low levels of cortisol combined with high levels of testosterone promote status-seeking behaviors with some differences between sexes. This has yet to be studied among psychiatric inpatients. To explore the joint association of the DHH (cortisol and testosterone) and sex with psychiatric inpatient aggression. The sample included 375 psychiatric inpatients (206 women) from the Signature Biobank in Canada. Following their admission in a psychiatric hospital, participants provided hair and saliva for cortisol and testosterone analysis, respectively. Aggressive behaviors from the clinical files were reviewed from admission to discharge. Men with high salivary testosterone combined with low hair cortisol had higher odds of displaying aggression compared to men with high salivary testosterone and high hair cortisol. Men with low salivary testosterone and low hair cortisol had lower odds to perpetrate aggression compared to men with low salivary testosterone and high hair cortisol levels. The cortisol and testosterone interaction was not significant in women. Findings are consistent with the DHH for men. Given that the context hospitalization may trigger status-seeking behaviors, actions could be taken such as identifying specific hormonal profiles at the time of admission to identify patients at risk of aggression, allowing for tailored care protocols.

Keywords: aggression; cortisol; dual‐hormone hypothesis; psychiatry; sex differences; testosterone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Probability of aggression by levels of salivary testosterone and hair cortisol for each sex. −1 refers to (mean − 1 SD) and +1 to (mean + 1 SD). Standard error bars (vertical bars) indicate how much the population mean is likely to differ from the sample mean. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Aiken, L. S. , West S. G., and Reno R. R.. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
    1. Archer, J. 2006. “Testosterone and Human Aggression: An Evaluation of the Challenge Hypothesis.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 30, no. 3: 319–345. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong, T. , Wells J., Boisvert D. L., et al. 2021. “An Exploratory Analysis of Testosterone, Cortisol, and Aggressive Behavior Type in Men and Women.” Biological Psychology 161: 108073. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brouillard, A. , Davignon L. M., Cernik R., et al. 2025. “Comparing Immunoassay and Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Salivary Sex Hormone Analysis.” Psychoneuroendocrinology 174: 107379. - PubMed
    1. Carré, J. M. , and Archer J.. 2018. “Testosterone and Human Behavior: The Role of Individual and Contextual Variables.” Current Opinion in Psychology 19: 149–153. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.021. - DOI - PubMed